H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:17 UTC
Adrian Mannarino vs Zhizhen Zhang H2H: 2-1
Adrian Mannarino holds a 2–1 lead over Zhizhen Zhang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Zhizhen Zhang leads 1–0 on clay, while Adrian Mannarino leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Adrian Mannarino won the 2026 Libema Open quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
China
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2026 | Libema Open | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Adrian Mannarino | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Zhizhen Zhang | Match data |
| Mar 19, 2026 | Miami Open Presented by Itau | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Adrian Mannarino | 6-3 6-2 | Zhizhen Zhang | Match data |
| May 11, 2024* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Zhizhen Zhang | 6-1 6-3 | Adrian Mannarino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Mannarino | #49 | #17 | 1,975 | 1,966 | 317 | 370 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Zhizhen Zhang | #156 | #31 | 1,351 | 1,842 | 57 | 74 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adrian Mannarino | Zhizhen Zhang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #413 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #87 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #192 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #45 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #60 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #410 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #43 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #35 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #22 | 1,907 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #69 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #49 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |