H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Albert Costa vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 6-2

Albert Costa holds a 6–2 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 4–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2003 Roland Garros third round 4-6 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-4.

ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 1, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Albert Costa #9 4-6 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #58 Match data
Aug 7, 2002* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Albert Costa #7 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #27 Match data
May 8, 2002* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Albert Costa #21 3-6 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #20 Match data
Jul 29, 2001* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 F Clay Nicolas Lapentti #36 1-6 6-4 7-5 7-5 Albert Costa #65 Match data
Nov 6, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Nicolas Lapentti #11 6-2 7-5 Albert Costa #24 Match data
Jul 11, 1999* Gstaad ATP 250 F Clay Albert Costa #28 7-6(4) 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #26 Match data
Mar 18, 1999* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Albert Costa #16 7-6(3) 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #45 Match data
Apr 15, 1998* Barcelona ATP 250 R64 Clay Albert Costa #20 4-6 6-3 6-1 Nicolas Lapentti #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 1,996 368 263 58.3% 1 1 0 0 10 12
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Costa Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,522 0 0 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,758 0 1 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 1996 46–26 63.9% #13 1,750 0 4 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,830 0 6 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,759 0 8 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 2000 29–22 56.9% #26 1,779 0 11 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,807 0 11 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,796 1 12 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,767 1 12 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,668 1 12 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,619 1 12 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,631 1 12 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5