H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Alex Corretja vs Emilio Sanchez H2H: 3-1

Alex Corretja holds a 3–1 lead over Emilio Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 1994 Chile Open round of 16 1-6 7-6(2) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alex Corretja
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Emilio Sanchez
ESP Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alex Corretja #25 1-6 7-6(2) 6-3 Emilio Sanchez #62 Match data Oct 28, 1994* R16 Chile Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Alex Corretja #31 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 Emilio Sanchez #77 Match data Oct 1, 1994* SF Palermo ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Emilio Sanchez #32 7-6(6) 2-6 6-4 Alex Corretja #95 Match data Apr 2, 1993* R16 Estoril Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Alex Corretja #215 3-6 6-2 6-2 Emilio Sanchez #13 Match data May 6, 1992* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 1,998 417 278 60.0% 0 2 1 5 9 17
Emilio Sanchez #1,301 #7 1,634 2,037 406 274 59.7% 0 1 0 1 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alex Corretja Emilio Sanchez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0 1984 9–12 42.9% #111 1,546 0 0
20 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,849 0 1 1985 16–14 53.3% #64 1,669 0 0
21 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,727 0 1 1986 52–23 69.3% #16 1,840 0 3
22 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1 1987 56–23 70.9% #17 1,870 0 7
23 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,840 0 4 1988 40–20 66.7% #17 1,887 0 8
24 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9 1989 37–16 69.8% #19 1,877 0 9
25 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9 1990 48–24 66.7% #8 1,814 0 11
26 2000 52–19 73.2% #8 1,933 0 14 1991 40–22 64.5% #14 1,849 0 14
27 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15 1992 43–26 62.3% #21 1,795 0 15
28 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17 1993 28–26 51.9% #41 1,688 0 15
29 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,649 0 17 1994 17–26 39.5% #74 1,630 0 15
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17 1995 13–22 37.1% #108 1,588 0 15
31 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17 1996 7–16 30.4% #173 1,505 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1997 0–4 0.0% #1056 1,467 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alex Corretja Emilio Sanchez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 6 5 11 54.5% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 24 20 44 54.5% — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1994 4 3 7 57.1% 39 18 57 68.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 15 11 26 57.7% — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1 7 8 12.5% 24 19 43 55.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 43 12 55 78.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
22 1996 12 9 21 57.1% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1987 8 9 17 47.1% 41 9 50 82.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
23 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1988 14 7 21 66.7% 25 10 35 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1998 24 8 32 75.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1989 16 6 22 72.7% 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1999 13 10 23 56.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 15 4 19 78.9% 28 12 40 70.0% — — — — 5 8 13 38.5%
26 2000 27 12 39 69.2% 23 5 28 82.1% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2001 9 9 18 50.0% 21 8 29 72.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 19 7 26 73.1% 22 13 35 62.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
28 2002 14 10 24 58.3% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 23 16 39 59.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2003 7 10 17 41.2% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 4 7 11 36.4% 13 18 31 41.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2004 6 9 15 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 12 18 30 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2005 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 5 11 16 31.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 104 237 56.1% 271 144 415 65.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 10 23 33 30.3% — 104 74 178 58.4% 280 159 439 63.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 18 33 51 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alex Corretja Emilio Sanchez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1567 127.1 -2.60 +0.75 0.968 49.4% +6 +8 — 46.6% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +1.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1658 141.2 -0.53 +1.13 0.997 50.2% -123 +64 — 50.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 4–10 (29%) — -1.01 1984 1546 126.4 — — — — — +91 — 48.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — +1.49
20 1994 1849 150.0 +0.83 +3.51 1.089 51.6% -259 +60 — 58.1% +0.50 23–10 (70%) 12–11 (52%) — -2.60 1985 1669 143.3 — — — — -164 +69 — 53.3% +0.61 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.05
21 1995 1727 136.5 -1.41 +2.29 1.002 50.0% -169 +65 — 52.4% +0.15 6–11 (35%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.97 1986 1841 151.3 — — — — -231 +97 — 64.0% +0.89 16–10 (62%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.99
22 1996 1784 149.2 +0.51 +2.14 1.060 50.8% -86 +90 -150 55.3% +0.47 10–4 (71%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.11 1987 1870 151.7 — — — — -232 +179 -269 64.9% +1.14 15–5 (75%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.87
23 1997 1840 154.1 +2.24 +5.27 1.237 54.3% -146 +167 — 65.9% +1.20 9–10 (47%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.17 1988 1888 152.5 — — — — -85 +107 — 62.4% +1.00 12–6 (67%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.75
24 1998 1963 157.7 +1.53 +2.59 1.122 52.2% -34 +97 — 63.7% +0.90 21–6 (78%) 19–14 (58%) — +0.17 1989 1877 153.9 — — — — -20 +114 — 66.9% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -1.74
25 1999 1771 145.8 +1.50 +0.88 1.054 51.0% +5 +184 — 55.6% +0.48 16–8 (67%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.15 1990 1814 155.5 — — — — +57 +66 — 60.3% +0.79 18–8 (69%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.85
26 2000 1933 161.5 +3.18 +4.08 1.199 53.1% -19 +143 — 68.0% +1.14 13–6 (68%) 20–10 (67%) — -1.65 1991 1850 150.0 — — — — -33 +123 — 62.3% +0.79 8–5 (62%) 14–12 (54%) — -0.75
27 2001 1781 141.6 -0.54 +1.48 1.001 50.1% -24 +247 — 57.9% +0.20 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) — -0.84 1992 1796 147.4 — — — — +6 +100 — 58.7% +0.63 14–8 (64%) 19–19 (50%) — -0.45
28 2002 1851 149.1 +1.45 +3.39 1.201 53.3% -106 +256 — 66.2% +0.99 7–9 (44%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.91 1993 1689 134.0 — — — — -26 +79 — 50.7% -0.16 11–12 (48%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.43
29 2003 1650 130.9 -1.00 -0.14 0.912 48.2% +41 +144 — 36.3% -0.62 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.20 1994 1630 135.6 — — — — -26 +71 — 39.4% -0.54 4–8 (33%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.30
30 2004 1623 126.5 -2.17 -0.03 0.939 48.9% +17 +95 — 43.7% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.64 1995 1588 125.5 — — — — -13 +45 — 39.8% -0.48 4–4 (50%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.36
31 2005 1572 105.8 -2.46 -1.57 0.794 45.4% — +73 — 9.1% -2.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.16 1996 1506 114.4 — — — — +43 +56 — 31.4% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.87
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1467 97.2 — — — — — +59 — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 — — -0.14
Career — 1998 152.9 +0.52 +2.39 1.070 51.3% -50 +121 -150 57.3% +0.52 139–94 (60%) 128–125 (51%) 100.4 -0.56 — 2038 151.2 — — — — -56 +97 -269 57.2% +0.54 117–85 (58%) 120–127 (49%) 97.8 -0.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.