H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Alexandr Dolgopolov vs Daniel Brands H2H: 1-0
Alexandr Dolgopolov holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Brands in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexandr Dolgopolov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexandr Dolgopolov won the 2013 Tokyo third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2013* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Alexandr Dolgopolov | 6-3 6-1 | Daniel Brands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandr Dolgopolov | #508 | #13 | 2,030 | 2,020 | 215 | 200 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Daniel Brands | #1,055 | #51 | 896 | 1,886 | 57 | 92 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Daniel Brands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #150 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #48 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #15 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #104 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #110 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #153 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #329 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #62 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #159 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #320 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #465 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |