H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Alexandr Dolgopolov vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-1

Alexandr Dolgopolov and Daniel Gimeno-Traver are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay, while Alexandr Dolgopolov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2014 Chile Open first round 7-6(4) 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alexandr Dolgopolov
UKR Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #85 7-6(4) 3-6 7-5 Alexandr Dolgopolov #52 Match data Feb 6, 2014* R32 Chile Open ATP 250 Clay
Alexandr Dolgopolov #38 4-6 6-1 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #60 Match data Aug 21, 2013* R32 Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alexandr Dolgopolov #508 #13 2,030 2,017 215 200 51.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alexandr Dolgopolov Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 0–1 0.0% #265 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 0–1 0.0% #233 1,434 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2009 1–1 50.0% #131 1,520 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2010 21–23 47.7% #48 1,776 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2011 38–29 56.7% #15 1,847 0 1 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2012 34–25 57.6% #18 1,891 0 2 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2013 21–26 44.7% #57 1,806 0 2 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2014 27–22 55.1% #23 1,869 0 2 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2015 25–26 49.0% #36 1,824 0 2 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2016 17–18 48.6% #62 1,773 0 2 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #38 1,905 0 3 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2018 5–5 50.0% #260 1,881 0 3 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alexandr Dolgopolov Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 6 9 15 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 22 16 38 57.9% 15 10 25 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2012 26 17 43 60.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2013 13 16 29 44.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2015 16 18 34 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2017 13 14 27 48.1% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2018 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 130 119 249 52.2% 62 61 123 50.4% 23 20 43 53.5% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 412/415 of Alexandr Dolgopolov's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alexandr Dolgopolov Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2006 1/1 5.0 1.0 58.1% 66.7% 46.2% 50.0% 33.3% 58.1% 29.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1/1 1.0 3.0 33.3% 69.2% 34.6% 33.3% — 46.2% 20.0% 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2009 2/2 4.5 1.0 67.4% 71.9% 46.2% 33.3% 100.0% 63.5% 37.7% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2010 44/44 8.6 2.8 54.8% 73.2% 52.7% 62.5% 41.3% 63.8% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 67/67 8.3 3.1 50.5% 75.8% 51.3% 52.9% 43.4% 63.7% 37.4% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2012 59/59 7.8 2.2 53.5% 75.6% 52.5% 60.2% 42.4% 64.8% 37.4% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2013 46/47 6.9 2.7 52.5% 75.7% 51.2% 49.2% 40.6% 64.0% 36.3% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2014 48/49 8.5 2.1 54.6% 76.0% 52.8% 61.5% 42.1% 65.3% 37.9% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2015 51/51 7.0 2.8 58.6% 74.8% 52.9% 57.8% 44.6% 65.7% 38.1% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2016 34/35 7.3 3.4 57.0% 73.0% 51.4% 58.1% 42.8% 63.4% 36.3% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2017 49/49 6.5 2.8 56.2% 74.7% 52.3% 58.7% 41.2% 64.9% 35.6% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2018 10/10 8.2 4.5 54.8% 72.1% 48.2% 59.3% 43.7% 61.3% 38.7% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
Career — 412/415 7.6 2.8 54.5% 74.9% 52.0% 57.3% 42.6% 64.3% 36.9% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alexandr Dolgopolov Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2006 1485 99.0 -1.68 -6.75 0.704 43.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1435 100.2 -3.07 -1.78 0.371 32.9% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2008 1471 106.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2009 1520 105.1 -1.33 +0.32 1.031 50.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.21 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2010 1777 143.2 +0.74 -0.39 0.984 49.7% -65 -104 -134 52.7% -0.15 7–13 (35%) 12–7 (63%) 100.7 -0.67 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 1847 155.9 +1.19 +0.46 1.032 50.5% +3 +12 -247 52.4% +0.17 13–4 (76%) 9–13 (41%) 106.6 +1.13 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2012 1892 158.6 +2.38 +0.43 1.061 50.7% +13 -26 -289 56.1% +0.44 12–12 (50%) 11–13 (46%) 96.9 +1.58 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2013 1807 149.8 +1.10 +0.15 1.008 50.0% +21 -54 -150 45.5% -0.26 4–7 (36%) 11–10 (52%) 97.2 +0.43 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2014 1869 166.5 +1.67 +2.37 1.091 51.3% +22 -42 -84 55.8% +0.39 7–10 (41%) 15–12 (56%) 99.1 -1.81 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2015 1824 155.6 +1.13 +2.28 1.110 51.4% 0 +16 -9 52.0% +0.32 8–11 (42%) 9–16 (36%) 92.9 +0.29 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2016 1773 148.1 -0.13 +0.66 0.994 49.8% +20 +75 +20 52.4% -0.05 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 98.6 +0.05 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2017 1905 157.7 +1.25 +0.29 1.012 50.3% -16 -27 -148 56.6% +0.20 4–6 (40%) 12–5 (71%) 101.1 -3.41 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2018 1881 139.9 -0.71 +0.84 1.001 50.2% +15 — — 55.6% +0.07 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 100.9 -0.78 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2017 158.3 +1.17 +0.76 1.034 50.5% +2 -22 -105 52.8% +0.13 61–72 (46%) 91–82 (53%) 98.2 -0.70 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.