H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alexandr Dolgopolov vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 1-1
Alexandr Dolgopolov and Tobias Kamke are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on clay, while Alexandr Dolgopolov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tobias Kamke won the 2014 Hamburg fourth round 7-5 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2014* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Tobias Kamke | 7-5 2-6 7-5 | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Alexandr Dolgopolov | 4-6 6-1 6-1 3-6 8-6 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandr Dolgopolov | #508 | #13 | 2,030 | 2,020 | 215 | 200 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Tobias Kamke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #48 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #15 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #62 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |