H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 1-1
Andrea Gaudenzi and Ronald Agenor are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1994 Rome Masters second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1994* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-2 6-3 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1994* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Ronald Agenor | 7-6(8) 6-3 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Ronald Agenor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 |