H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andreas Beck vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 0-1
Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Andreas Beck in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2010 Gstaad fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 40
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2010* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 7-5 6-4 | Andreas Beck | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2009 | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 1-6 6-3 7-6(5) | Andreas Beck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Beck | #1,283 | #33 | 1,115 | 1,754 | 38 | 63 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreas Beck | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #336 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #39 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #154 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #98 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #446 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #364 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |