H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Andreas Beck vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 0-1

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Andreas Beck in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2010 Swiss Open Gstaad second round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andreas Beck
GER Age 40 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #74 7-5 6-4 Andreas Beck #79 Match data Jul 30, 2010* R16 Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #79 1-6 6-3 7-6(5) Andreas Beck #57 Match data Apr 27, 2009 Q2 Q Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andreas Beck #1,283 #33 1,115 1,756 38 63 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andreas Beck Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 1–1 50.0% #336 1,508 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2005 1–1 50.0% #286 1,520 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2006 0–2 0.0% #233 1,481 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #209 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 5–7 41.7% #109 1,627 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2009 22–20 52.4% #39 1,708 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2010 7–14 33.3% #154 1,646 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2011 0–4 0.0% #98 1,642 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2012 2–6 25.0% #446 1,622 0 0 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2013 0–2 0.0% #186 1,648 0 0 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2014 0–3 0.0% #116 1,660 0 0 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2015 0–1 0.0% #387 1,607 0 0 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2016 0–1 0.0% #364 1,615 0 0 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andreas Beck Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2009 9 11 20 45.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2011 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 14 24 38 36.8% 17 32 49 34.7% 7 7 14 50.0% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 100/101 of Andreas Beck's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andreas Beck Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 0.5 2.0 61.0% 62.4% 51.3% 0.0% 26.5% 58.0% 42.7% 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 2005 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.2% 59.9% 59.2% 35.7% 33.9% 59.8% 35.8% 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2006 2/2 3.5 6.5 60.5% 58.9% 55.5% 54.2% 46.0% 57.8% 37.5% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2007 1/1 2.0 6.0 66.7% 63.2% 52.9% 45.5% 42.9% 59.8% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 12/12 7.9 5.3 61.1% 73.7% 52.3% 70.5% 42.7% 65.0% 30.4% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2009 42/42 5.2 4.2 59.2% 73.3% 53.4% 65.3% 34.1% 64.8% 36.7% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2010 21/21 3.6 5.4 57.3% 69.1% 51.5% 57.0% 40.3% 61.4% 33.0% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2011 4/4 2.0 1.0 64.7% 62.7% 53.5% 43.5% 4.2% 59.4% 27.2% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2012 7/8 2.0 2.7 58.3% 58.0% 44.3% 46.4% 29.3% 52.9% 29.4% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2013 2/2 4.0 5.5 53.2% 63.4% 48.8% 64.1% 37.2% 56.5% 34.8% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2014 3/3 2.3 5.0 60.0% 57.9% 41.6% 54.4% 57.1% 52.0% 33.1% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2015 1/1 7.0 4.0 56.2% 70.7% 65.6% 0.0% 40.0% 68.5% 28.0% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 62.3% 51.5% 30.0% 44.4% 50.0% 43.4% 34.5% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
Career — 100/101 4.5 4.4 59.2% 69.2% 51.8% 58.5% 36.1% 61.9% 34.1% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andreas Beck Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1508 105.4 +0.07 -0.10 1.016 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.04 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2005 1520 108.7 +1.85 -1.03 0.891 48.5% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.03 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2006 1482 102.2 +1.46 -0.28 0.889 48.1% — — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.16 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2007 1505 107.7 -0.73 -0.46 0.868 47.1% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.15 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1627 117.3 +0.69 -2.92 0.867 48.6% -27 -118 +30 44.1% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.26 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20
23 2009 1708 137.1 +0.90 -0.74 1.043 50.5% -47 +4 -58 49.1% +0.02 9–4 (69%) 12–10 (55%) — +2.03 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24
24 2010 1646 125.7 -1.42 -2.64 0.855 47.8% -13 -8 +35 40.4% -0.60 2–5 (29%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.20 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95
25 2011 1643 110.7 -0.84 -1.54 0.670 43.4% — -36 — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–2 — -0.48 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72
26 2012 1622 112.1 -3.92 -3.25 0.624 42.1% -4 — — 43.8% -0.94 0–2 1–0 — +0.21 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11
27 2013 1649 113.4 +0.94 -2.27 0.801 45.6% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.26 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22
28 2014 1660 112.8 -2.60 -2.37 0.688 42.9% — — — 11.1% -2.56 — 0–1 — -0.25 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44
29 2015 1607 112.5 -0.11 -2.14 0.889 48.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.07 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04
30 2016 1615 106.0 -3.50 -3.31 0.609 38.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1757 127.8 -0.18 -1.71 0.896 48.2% -32 -17 +5 41.2% -0.51 14–19 (42%) 25–24 (51%) 97.6 +1.82 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.