H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andreas Beck vs Ivan Navarro H2H: 1-0
Andreas Beck holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Navarro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andreas Beck leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andreas Beck won the 2009 Roland Garros first round 7-6(9) 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 40
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Andreas Beck | 7-6(9) 6-4 6-1 | Ivan Navarro | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2009 | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Andreas Beck | 7-6(7) 6-2 | Ivan Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Beck | #1,283 | #33 | 1,115 | 1,754 | 38 | 63 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ivan Navarro | #1,929 | #67 | 1,108 | 1,627 | 35 | 65 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreas Beck | Ivan Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #336 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #39 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #138 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #154 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #128 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #98 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #124 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #446 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #74 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #127 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #193 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #364 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |