H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andreas Haider-Maurer vs Daniel Brands H2H: 1-1
Andreas Haider-Maurer and Daniel Brands are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andreas Haider-Maurer leads 1–0 on clay, while Daniel Brands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andreas Haider-Maurer won the 2014 Roland Garros first round 4-6 4-6 6-2 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 39
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Andreas Haider-Maurer | 4-6 4-6 6-2 6-3 6-4 | Daniel Brands | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2013* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Brands | 6-4 7-6(5) | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Haider-Maurer | #486 | #47 | 946 | 1,749 | 39 | 74 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Brands | #1,055 | #51 | 896 | 1,886 | 57 | 92 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Daniel Brands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #150 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #104 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #119 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #110 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #153 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #112 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #329 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #159 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #63 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #320 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2018 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #465 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |