H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Andreas Haider-Maurer vs Pere Riba H2H: 0-1
Pere Riba holds a 1–0 lead over Andreas Haider-Maurer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pere Riba leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pere Riba won the 2011 Moscow third round 6-2 6-7(1) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 39
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q3 | Clay | Pere Riba | 6-4 7-6(4) | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2011* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Pere Riba | 6-2 6-7(1) 6-3 | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Haider-Maurer | #486 | #47 | 946 | 1,749 | 39 | 74 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pere Riba | #1,502 | #65 | 761 | 1,731 | 24 | 63 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Pere Riba | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #121 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #72 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #119 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #112 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #63 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |