H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 2-0

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 2–0 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1993 Barcelona Open round of 64 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Chesnokov #58 6-1 6-4 Ronald Agenor #107 Match data Apr 7, 1993* R64 Barcelona Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Andrei Chesnokov #16 6-4 6-2 Ronald Agenor #28 Match data Oct 28, 1988* R16 Paris Masters ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Ronald Agenor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Ronald Agenor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4%
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Ronald Agenor
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2% 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1%
27 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2% 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8%
28 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1% 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2%
29 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6% 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5%
30 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3% 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9%
31 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9% 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1%
32 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1% 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2%
Career — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3% — 182/468 3.2 2.0 63.9% 64.4% 47.6% 52.5% 43.3% 58.3% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Ronald Agenor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 -0.26 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) 102.4 -0.88 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) 108.9 +0.32 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -1.29 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) 106.7 +2.31 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) 97.6 +0.62 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) 95.7 -1.43 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) 110.2 -1.46 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) 108.6 -0.96 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) 93.7 +0.46 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) 94.7 -0.37 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.