H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andrei Pavel vs Marcos Daniel H2H: 2-0
Andrei Pavel holds a 2–0 lead over Marcos Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Pavel leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Pavel won the 2006 Kitzbuhel third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2006* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrei Pavel | 6-4 6-4 | Marcos Daniel | Match data |
| May 26, 2006* | Poertschach | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrei Pavel | 7-5 6-0 | Marcos Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Pavel | #890 | #13 | 1,550 | 1,904 | 249 | 248 | 50.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Marcos Daniel | #904 | #56 | 942 | 1,649 | 20 | 63 | 24.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Pavel | Marcos Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #68 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #41 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #94 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #165 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #69 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #87 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #18 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #80 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2006 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #113 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #904 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2007 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1142 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2009 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |