H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Aslan Karatsev vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 2-1
Aslan Karatsev holds a 2–1 lead over Diego Schwartzman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Aslan Karatsev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2022 Cincinnati Masters third round 7-6(3) 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2022* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Diego Schwartzman | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 | Aslan Karatsev | Match data |
| May 5, 2021* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Aslan Karatsev | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Aslan Karatsev | 6-3 6-3 6-3 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aslan Karatsev | #369 | #14 | 2,633 | 1,985 | 78 | 86 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aslan Karatsev | Diego Schwartzman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2021 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #18 | 1,869 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2022 | 17–29 | 37.0% | #59 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2023 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2024 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #287 | 1,681 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |