H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Aslan Karatsev vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 0-2

Jeremy Chardy holds a 2–0 lead over Aslan Karatsev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2021 Tokyo Olympics second round 7-5 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Aslan Karatsev
Russia Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Chardy #68 7-5 4-6 6-3 Aslan Karatsev #24 Match data Jul 28, 2021* R32 Tokyo Olympics Olympics Hard
Jeremy Chardy #61 7-6(4) 7-6(6) 6-3 Aslan Karatsev #24 Match data Jun 30, 2021* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jeremy Chardy #72 6-4 6-0 Aslan Karatsev #271 Match data Oct 6, 2019* Q1 Q Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Aslan Karatsev #369 #14 2,633 1,985 79 87 47.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Aslan Karatsev Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2013 0–2 0.0% #292 1,509 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 2014 0–1 0.0% #218 1,550 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2015 1–1 50.0% #195 1,574 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2016 0–2 0.0% #235 1,598 0 0 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2020 2–3 40.0% #112 1,636 0 0 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2021 34–20 63.0% #18 1,867 0 2 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2022 17–29 37.0% #59 1,631 0 3 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2023 22–19 53.7% #35 1,818 0 3 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2024 3–10 23.1% #287 1,680 0 3 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Aslan Karatsev Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2015 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2021 24 12 36 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2022 11 18 29 37.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2023 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2024 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 53 56 109 48.6% 22 23 45 48.9% 4 8 12 33.3% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 164/166 of Aslan Karatsev's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Aslan Karatsev Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2013 2/2 2.0 3.0 57.6% 62.3% 47.7% 56.0% 9.1% 55.4% 33.5% 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 2014 1/1 2.0 3.0 67.8% 60.0% 52.6% 62.5% 20.0% 57.6% 37.1% 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2015 2/2 2.0 3.0 65.3% 61.9% 55.0% 50.0% 35.8% 59.5% 45.1% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2016 2/2 1.5 3.0 60.5% 63.0% 39.1% 61.3% 61.5% 53.7% 29.1% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2020 5/5 5.8 4.8 54.3% 73.3% 47.9% 61.4% 58.3% 62.2% 37.3% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2021 52/54 4.7 3.7 59.4% 73.4% 53.3% 58.8% 39.4% 65.2% 38.7% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2022 46/46 4.7 5.0 59.1% 70.1% 49.2% 55.5% 40.5% 61.5% 36.8% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2023 41/41 6.3 5.2 59.3% 75.2% 50.7% 63.4% 41.1% 65.2% 34.5% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 2024 13/13 4.1 3.4 63.0% 68.2% 49.7% 56.4% 43.7% 61.4% 34.1% 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
Career — 164/166 5.0 4.4 59.5% 72.0% 50.8% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 36.6% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Aslan Karatsev Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2012 1471 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1510 109.6 -0.26 -2.56 0.752 44.4% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2014 1551 107.8 -0.62 -1.10 0.877 46.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.02 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2015 1574 111.4 -0.63 +0.65 1.113 52.0% — — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.08 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) 104.0 -0.36
22 2016 1599 109.4 -3.15 -2.40 0.629 43.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.09 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) 108.8 -2.59
23 2017 1584 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 105.6 -2.43
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) 93.3 -0.53
25 2019 1569 106.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 101.5 +1.81
26 2020 1637 125.4 -0.63 +0.29 0.986 50.2% +29 — — 46.2% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.06 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 99.8 +2.11
27 2021 1867 157.8 +2.15 +2.50 1.113 51.7% +23 -153 -317 59.0% +0.58 11–7 (61%) 6–9 (40%) 104.9 -0.81 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) 102.1 +0.64
28 2022 1632 137.3 -1.44 +0.46 0.956 49.3% +37 +33 -91 42.6% -0.40 7–15 (32%) 9–13 (41%) 90.6 +2.11 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) 97.1 -0.92
29 2023 1818 140.4 +1.00 -0.97 0.989 50.1% -55 +21 -260 53.8% +0.18 5–5 (50%) 14–11 (56%) 103.6 +0.74 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 91.1 +2.28
30 2024 1680 118.5 -1.65 -1.34 0.884 48.0% +7 +48 — 35.7% -0.89 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.67 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -1.26
31 2025 1659 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) 106.3 -1.20
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) 98.6 -2.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) 106.9 -2.92
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 1986 141.9 +0.32 +0.52 0.999 50.1% +7 -30 -229 50.2% +0.03 25–35 (42%) 33–37 (47%) 97.1 +0.80 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.