H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:15 UTC
Benoit Paire vs Bradley Klahn
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Benoit Paire vs Bradley Klahn.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
USA
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Bradley Klahn | #1,096 | #63 | 731 | 1,733 | 13 | 43 | 23.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benoit Paire | Bradley Klahn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #669 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #248 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #148 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #877 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |