H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Bernard Tomic holds a 1–0 lead over Adrian Menendez Maceiras in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2015 Bogota round of 16 6-7(5) 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | Match data | Jul 24, 2015* | R16 | Bogota | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #179 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,972 | 172 | 184 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Adrian Menendez Maceiras | — | — | — | 1,644 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Bernard Tomic | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,589 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #179 | 1,573 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Bernard Tomic | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | ||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2009 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2010 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2013 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2012 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2017 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2013 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2018 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2019 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 31 | 17 | 48 | 64.6% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 121 | 110 | 231 | 52.4% | 16 | 43 | 59 | 27.1% | 35 | 31 | 66 | 53.0% | Career | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's and 24/24 of Adrian Menendez Maceiras's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Bernard Tomic | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2009 | 4/4 | 4.8 | 3.3 | 60.2% | 56.3% | 47.1% | 57.1% | 24.5% | 52.6% | 29.2% | 2012 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 57.6% | 61.4% | 45.2% | 50.0% | 20.0% | 54.5% | 27.3% |
| 2010 | 8/8 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 64.3% | 65.2% | 45.9% | 58.2% | 34.1% | 58.3% | 33.8% | 2013 | 2/2 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 62.0% | 54.0% | 41.9% | 54.2% | 25.0% | 49.3% | 25.7% |
| 2011 | 28/28 | 6.5 | 2.4 | 65.8% | 70.0% | 50.1% | 63.0% | 36.9% | 62.9% | 34.1% | 2015 | 5/5 | 6.0 | 3.2 | 58.6% | 68.8% | 51.3% | 57.4% | 54.9% | 61.5% | 30.9% |
| 2012 | 47/48 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 65.8% | 67.4% | 50.2% | 57.5% | 36.4% | 61.4% | 35.1% | 2017 | 6/6 | 5.0 | 1.7 | 61.5% | 69.1% | 47.8% | 48.6% | 38.5% | 61.8% | 33.5% |
| 2013 | 43/43 | 8.0 | 1.3 | 66.4% | 71.1% | 51.3% | 64.6% | 38.6% | 64.4% | 32.7% | 2018 | 6/6 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 63.8% | 65.7% | 46.2% | 56.4% | 40.0% | 58.1% | 33.1% |
| 2014 | 32/33 | 9.3 | 1.1 | 67.2% | 73.6% | 52.5% | 58.0% | 40.9% | 66.8% | 33.0% | 2019 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 58.7% | 62.7% | 45.2% | 43.3% | 45.9% | 55.4% | 32.5% |
| 2015 | 63/64 | 9.1 | 1.5 | 66.1% | 73.1% | 50.9% | 66.3% | 40.9% | 65.5% | 34.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 51/51 | 9.4 | 2.3 | 65.3% | 72.5% | 48.8% | 59.9% | 36.0% | 64.4% | 33.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 29/30 | 6.9 | 1.9 | 66.7% | 69.5% | 51.7% | 60.9% | 35.3% | 63.3% | 31.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 16/16 | 9.4 | 1.3 | 67.3% | 73.5% | 50.8% | 61.3% | 43.7% | 66.0% | 35.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22/22 | 9.1 | 1.9 | 64.6% | 68.5% | 43.9% | 56.2% | 36.0% | 59.5% | 29.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1/1 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 68.8% | 64.1% | 44.8% | 76.5% | 16.7% | 58.1% | 31.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 2/2 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 58.8% | 68.0% | 37.1% | 65.6% | 28.6% | 56.1% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 3/3 | 5.3 | 2.0 | 58.0% | 69.0% | 48.3% | 61.0% | 37.7% | 59.7% | 33.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 3/3 | 8.3 | 2.7 | 63.0% | 71.3% | 41.3% | 46.3% | 38.0% | 61.0% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Bernard Tomic | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2008 | 1502 | 94.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1472 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1526 | 105.3 | -2.94 | -0.81 | 0.615 | 41.2% | -3 | — | — | 30.8% | -2.23 | — | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.09 | 2008 | 1448 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1591 | 118.9 | -1.47 | -0.26 | 0.811 | 46.8% | -52 | — | +98 | 34.8% | -1.00 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.20 | 2009 | 1427 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1791 | 144.2 | +0.77 | -1.38 | 0.919 | 48.9% | -92 | — | +124 | 51.9% | -0.18 | 6–6 (50%) | 13–4 (76%) | 110.1 | -0.34 | 2010 | 1407 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1757 | 150.9 | -1.11 | -0.69 | 0.907 | 48.6% | +52 | -169 | +23 | 46.3% | -0.31 | 7–6 (54%) | 7–8 (47%) | 102.8 | -1.42 | 2011 | 1425 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1787 | 149.3 | +0.99 | -2.79 | 0.919 | 48.8% | -8 | -226 | +96 | 50.5% | -0.09 | 7–5 (58%) | 16–12 (57%) | 106.0 | -1.00 | 2012 | 1499 | 98.1 | -0.33 | -2.29 | 0.600 | 41.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.01 |
| 2014 | 1835 | 142.5 | +1.91 | -1.36 | 0.995 | 49.7% | +21 | — | +30 | 53.2% | +0.01 | 7–5 (58%) | 11–12 (48%) | 99.3 | -0.73 | 2013 | 1574 | 109.6 | -2.38 | -2.31 | 0.508 | 38.5% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -3.17 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 2015 | 1915 | 162.1 | +1.61 | -0.87 | 0.990 | 50.4% | +64 | -388 | -38 | 57.6% | +0.46 | 12–12 (50%) | 18–21 (46%) | 98.4 | +2.35 | 2014 | 1563 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1875 | 151.1 | +0.69 | -2.24 | 0.928 | 49.4% | +25 | -337 | +82 | 57.0% | +0.26 | 9–7 (56%) | 12–15 (44%) | 98.6 | +2.21 | 2015 | 1610 | 113.9 | -2.56 | -4.46 | 0.803 | 46.7% | -2 | — | — | 35.7% | -1.07 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.22 |
| 2017 | 1728 | 133.1 | -0.38 | -4.25 | 0.846 | 47.7% | -3 | -160 | +146 | 36.6% | -0.72 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–8 (33%) | 98.6 | -0.82 | 2016 | 1588 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1745 | 126.0 | +1.66 | -1.18 | 1.046 | 50.5% | -2 | — | +164 | 56.8% | +0.20 | 3–4 (43%) | 8–2 (80%) | 102.2 | +1.42 | 2017 | 1607 | 112.5 | -1.85 | -1.76 | 0.877 | 47.9% | +51 | — | — | 43.8% | -0.69 | 0–2 | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.66 |
| 2019 | 1621 | 132.2 | -3.23 | -3.79 | 0.733 | 45.7% | +73 | -101 | +197 | 34.0% | -1.08 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–5 (50%) | 99.7 | -0.65 | 2018 | 1604 | 116.5 | -2.99 | -1.63 | 0.789 | 46.5% | +59 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.4 | +0.09 |
| 2020 | 1590 | 103.5 | -0.93 | -0.44 | 0.755 | 45.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | 2019 | 1598 | 111.3 | -3.29 | -1.62 | 0.729 | 44.2% | — | — | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.06 |
| 2021 | 1608 | 104.1 | -1.59 | +0.30 | 0.788 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.09 | 2020 | 1584 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1577 | 102.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1558 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 1563 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1593 | 108.5 | -0.49 | -2.98 | 0.826 | 46.7% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.29 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 1574 | 107.6 | -0.80 | +1.09 | 1.034 | 51.0% | +28 | — | — | 66.7% | +1.00 | — | — | — | +0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1973 | 147.3 | +0.35 | -1.82 | 0.915 | 48.9% | +19 | -225 | +90 | 49.9% | -0.13 | 59–53 (53%) | 98–89 (52%) | 105.0 | +0.30 | Career | 1645 | 111.3 | -2.50 | -2.33 | 0.764 | 45.6% | +38 | — | — | 34.4% | -1.33 | 3–8 (27%) | 9–7 (56%) | 98.7 | +3.83 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Gasquet | 2 | 8 | 10 | Jun 16, 2018 | H2H |
| Alexandr Dolgopolov | 4 | 6 | 10 | Feb 27, 2016 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 0 | 7 | 7 | Mar 23, 2019 | H2H |
| Fernando Verdasco | 6 | 1 | 7 | Jun 16, 2018 | H2H |
| David Ferrer | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jan 4, 2017 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 7, 2019 | — |
| Taro Daniel | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 12, 2019 | — |
| Fernando Verdasco | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 11, 2019 | — |
| Christopher Eubanks | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 14, 2019 | — |
| Denis Shapovalov | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 20, 2018 | — |