H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs Bradley Klahn H2H: 1-0

Bernard Tomic holds a 1–0 lead over Bradley Klahn in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2018 Chengdu Open first round 6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Bradley Klahn
USA Age 36 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bernard Tomic #123 6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-2 Bradley Klahn #95 Match data Sep 27, 2018* R32 Chengdu Open ATP 250 Hard
Bradley Klahn #116 7-5 3-0 (ret.) Bernard Tomic #150 Match data Aug 6, 2018 Q1 Q Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Bradley Klahn #1,096 #63 731 1,734 13 43 23.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic Bradley Klahn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1 2011 0–1 0.0% — 1,525 0 0
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2 2012 1–2 33.3% #248 1,638 0 0
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3 2013 1–3 25.0% #97 1,602 0 0
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3 2014 2–11 15.4% #148 1,549 0 0
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4 — — — — — — —
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4 — — — — — — —
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4 2018 5–8 38.5% #76 1,708 0 0
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4 2019 4–14 22.2% #135 1,645 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #149 1,570 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #873 1,485 0 0
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4 2023 0–1 0.0% #877 1,479 0 0
33 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernard Tomic Bradley Klahn
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2012 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0% — 11 32 43 25.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's and 56/56 of Bradley Klahn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bernard Tomic Bradley Klahn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1% 2010 1/1 6.0 7.0 69.5% 69.2% 40.0% 56.3% 27.3% 60.3% 31.3%
20 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7% 2011 1/1 1.0 4.0 58.0% 62.1% 42.9% 40.0% 0.0% 54.0% 22.4%
21 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0% 2012 3/3 7.3 4.3 64.4% 62.3% 41.6% 60.4% 44.4% 55.0% 37.4%
22 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2% 2013 4/4 8.0 2.3 66.9% 73.3% 51.5% 25.0% 33.5% 65.9% 33.7%
23 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1% 2014 13/13 6.7 5.5 58.6% 66.8% 46.4% 53.4% 33.7% 58.4% 32.0%
24 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6% 2018 13/13 9.2 4.5 59.8% 75.5% 53.9% 50.6% 38.6% 66.9% 28.2%
28 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6% 2019 18/18 8.8 4.6 59.5% 72.2% 52.6% 60.3% 34.4% 64.4% 29.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 10.0 5.0 62.9% 63.0% 44.2% 64.7% 50.0% 56.0% 26.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 6.0 3.0 52.2% 58.3% 54.5% 50.0% — 56.5% 20.0%
32 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3% 2023 1/1 4.0 5.0 68.9% 66.7% 31.6% 66.7% 0.0% 55.7% 23.5%
33 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3% — 56/56 7.9 4.6 60.4% 70.5% 49.9% 53.5% 34.0% 62.5% 30.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernard Tomic Bradley Klahn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.42 2010 1499 108.4 -1.52 +3.65 0.787 46.9% — — — 25.0% -1.25 — — — -0.11
20 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.00 2011 1525 112.8 +0.69 +0.59 0.488 38.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19
21 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.73 2012 1639 117.2 -2.52 -0.18 0.831 46.8% +35 — — 36.4% -1.18 1–1 — — +0.09
22 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) — +2.35 2013 1603 112.5 -1.91 -0.65 0.991 48.3% +55 — — 33.3% -0.67 — 2–3 (40%) — +0.13
23 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) — +2.21 2014 1550 122.4 -3.31 -2.26 0.770 45.5% +73 — -31 30.0% -1.58 2–4 (33%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.32
24 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.82 2015 1548 102.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.65 2017 1549 103.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2018 1709 132.3 +1.07 -2.48 0.852 48.3% -22 — — 38.2% -0.56 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.18
28 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 2019 1646 123.8 -0.08 -4.65 0.825 47.6% +21 — -93 28.3% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 4–6 (40%) — 0.00
29 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1570 96.9 -1.18 -3.05 0.594 43.1% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — — — +0.34
31 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1485 106.5 -0.77 -0.68 0.460 42.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
32 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04 2023 1480 104.5 +0.15 -2.16 0.532 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.02
33 2026 1574 107.6 -0.90 +0.99 1.034 51.0% +27 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30 — 1734 124.5 -0.86 -2.68 0.801 46.8% +25 — -66 30.6% -1.17 6–9 (40%) 17–16 (52%) 101.2 -0.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.