H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs Mischa Zverev H2H: 1-1

Bernard Tomic and Mischa Zverev are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Mischa Zverev won the 2017 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Mischa Zverev
GER Age 39 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mischa Zverev #30 6-4 6-3 6-4 Bernard Tomic #59 Match data Jul 5, 2017* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Bernard Tomic #60 6-3 6-2 Mischa Zverev #30 Match data Jun 29, 2017* R16 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Mischa Zverev #1,373 #25 1,664 2,007 134 199 40.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic Mischa Zverev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0 2006 3–3 50.0% #151 1,529 0 0
19 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0 2007 6–8 42.9% #88 1,606 0 0
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1 2008 18–23 43.9% #80 1,710 0 0
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2 2009 15–24 38.5% #78 1,630 0 0
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3 2010 14–18 43.8% #82 1,675 0 0
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3 2011 2–18 10.0% #211 1,494 0 0
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3 2012 0–3 0.0% #159 1,608 0 0
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4 2013 4–5 44.4% #176 1,638 0 0
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4 — — — — — — —
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4 2015 7–8 46.7% #171 1,840 0 0
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4 2016 12–14 46.2% #51 1,916 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2017 30–31 49.2% #33 1,850 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 19–29 39.6% #69 1,685 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2019 3–12 20.0% #281 1,572 0 1
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4 2020 1–2 33.3% #264 1,568 0 1
33 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4 2021 0–1 0.0% #346 1,522 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernard Tomic Mischa Zverev
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2006 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2007 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
20 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2008 12 12 24 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
21 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 6 14 20 30.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2010 11 11 22 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2011 1 8 9 11.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
24 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 11 10 21 52.4% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 18 19 37 48.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 7 18 25 28.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 4 5 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0% — — — — — 79 114 193 40.9% 25 54 79 31.6% 30 30 60 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's and 328/333 of Mischa Zverev's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bernard Tomic Mischa Zverev
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1% 2006 6/6 6.8 1.3 70.7% 71.2% 46.2% 58.2% 49.7% 63.9% 31.9%
19 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1% 2007 14/14 5.1 2.1 61.6% 67.2% 50.3% 58.5% 37.5% 61.1% 37.3%
20 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7% 2008 37/41 4.6 1.4 66.7% 68.6% 50.2% 58.3% 36.2% 62.2% 35.2%
21 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0% 2009 39/39 4.5 1.9 63.4% 68.0% 49.5% 64.7% 42.3% 61.6% 36.0%
22 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2% 2010 31/32 3.5 2.2 66.3% 66.5% 46.8% 50.4% 38.5% 59.6% 35.1%
23 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1% 2011 20/20 2.0 1.8 64.3% 60.1% 46.8% 53.8% 42.6% 55.3% 33.2%
24 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1% 2012 3/3 6.3 3.7 58.7% 62.8% 44.1% 52.4% 34.5% 55.2% 35.9%
25 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6% 2013 9/9 3.7 2.8 67.3% 64.3% 42.0% 41.6% 38.3% 57.1% 35.7%
26 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6% 2015 15/15 7.1 1.8 67.5% 68.9% 50.7% 63.6% 34.2% 63.4% 34.5%
28 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6% 2016 26/26 5.2 2.0 64.7% 73.1% 52.8% 59.2% 43.3% 65.8% 38.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 61/61 6.4 2.7 65.2% 71.5% 50.5% 62.7% 45.4% 64.1% 33.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 48/48 5.5 2.4 59.6% 71.3% 49.0% 57.0% 35.0% 62.2% 36.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 15/15 4.3 2.7 64.4% 64.1% 43.7% 58.5% 27.5% 57.0% 28.0%
32 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3% 2020 3/3 2.0 2.7 62.3% 68.9% 51.4% 55.0% 33.5% 62.4% 33.2%
33 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3% 2021 1/1 5.0 2.0 57.1% 63.5% 43.6% 50.0% 44.4% 54.9% 38.8%
Career — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3% — 328/333 5.0 2.2 64.3% 68.7% 49.0% 58.4% 39.5% 61.7% 35.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernard Tomic Mischa Zverev
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) 110.1 -0.34 2006 1530 115.8 +0.34 -1.37 0.883 47.7% +10 — — 53.3% -0.33 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 102.6 +0.06
19 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 102.8 -1.42 2007 1607 116.8 -1.19 -0.21 0.960 49.3% -7 — +18 38.9% -0.53 3–1 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.28
20 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.0 -1.00 2008 1710 130.6 -0.67 -1.51 0.931 48.5% +11 -218 -40 48.4% -0.28 5–9 (36%) 6–11 (35%) 95.4 -0.70
21 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) 99.3 -0.73 2009 1631 136.9 -1.54 -0.05 0.938 49.1% -40 -24 +85 42.9% -0.23 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 96.5 -1.09
22 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) 98.4 +2.35 2010 1676 123.2 -3.33 -0.90 0.868 47.4% +17 -183 +32 40.6% -0.93 5–2 (71%) 9–3 (75%) 109.2 +0.75
23 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) 98.6 +2.21 2011 1494 114.1 -4.27 -2.53 0.741 44.2% +80 -81 +114 18.4% -2.12 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 -0.49
24 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) 98.6 -0.82 2012 1608 128.0 -1.03 -1.71 0.801 46.0% — — — 22.2% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.34
25 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) 102.2 +1.42 2013 1639 122.4 -3.28 -0.27 0.834 46.7% +34 — +13 42.9% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 101.9 +0.46
26 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 -0.65 2014 1561 110.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2015 1840 138.3 -0.20 +0.40 0.943 48.8% -46 — -30 45.9% -0.19 4–3 (57%) 8–8 (50%) 103.7 -1.92
28 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 2016 1916 147.9 +1.33 +2.10 1.114 51.4% +45 -348 — 50.8% +0.49 2–6 (25%) 5–11 (31%) 93.6 +0.12
29 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1851 155.7 +0.36 -1.01 0.943 49.0% +5 -186 -5 49.4% -0.13 12–8 (60%) 11–16 (41%) 101.5 -2.26
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1686 141.4 -1.71 -0.03 0.956 48.9% -37 +19 +171 45.7% -0.27 5–11 (31%) 7–10 (41%) 92.2 +0.05
31 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1572 115.7 -3.93 -5.33 0.650 43.0% +27 +27 +220 12.9% -2.61 — 1–1 — +0.08
32 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04 2020 1569 116.2 -1.52 +0.52 0.884 47.5% +30 — — 33.3% -0.33 — 0–1 — -0.12
33 2026 1574 107.6 -0.86 +1.01 1.034 51.0% +28 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24 2021 1522 101.7 -1.33 +1.31 0.862 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.11
Career — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30 — 2007 139.5 -1.26 -0.72 0.912 48.3% +4 -113 +63 42.8% -0.48 49–59 (45%) 64–79 (45%) 96.9 -1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.