H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bill Scanlon vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 4-0
Bill Scanlon holds a 4–0 lead over Ray Ruffels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Bill Scanlon leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1979 Dayton third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1979* | Dayton | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bill Scanlon | 6-3 6-3 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Dec 8, 1977* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Bill Scanlon | 7-6 6-3 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Oct 14, 1977* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Bill Scanlon | 3-6 7-6 11-9 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1977* | Palm Springs | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bill Scanlon | 6-4 6-2 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |