H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Blaz Kavcic vs Antonio Veic H2H: 1-2
Antonio Veic holds a 2–1 lead over Blaz Kavcic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Antonio Veic leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Antonio Veic won the 2012 Kitzbuhel third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2012* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Antonio Veic | 6-1 6-2 | Blaz Kavcic | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2012* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Blaz Kavcic | 6-2 6-2 | Antonio Veic | Match data |
| May 3, 2012* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Antonio Veic | 6-1 6-1 | Blaz Kavcic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blaz Kavcic | #1,195 | #68 | 685 | 1,810 | 40 | 79 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Antonio Veic | #888 | #119 | 468 | 1,719 | 10 | 22 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Blaz Kavcic | Antonio Veic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #285 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #220 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #191 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #112 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #92 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #94 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #104 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #105 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #151 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #206 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |