H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Bohdan Ulihrach vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 2-0
Bohdan Ulihrach holds a 2–0 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bohdan Ulihrach leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bohdan Ulihrach won the 2000 Santiago fourth round 6-3 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2000* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Bohdan Ulihrach | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1996* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bohdan Ulihrach | 4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(6) | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bohdan Ulihrach | Ronald Agenor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 |