H2H data updated: 2026-07-15 19:16 UTC
Borna Coric vs Bradley Klahn H2H: 1-0
Borna Coric holds a 1–0 lead over Bradley Klahn in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Borna Coric leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Borna Coric won the 2018 Shanghai Masters third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2018* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Borna Coric | 6-4 6-2 | Bradley Klahn | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Bradley Klahn | #1,096 | #63 | 731 | 1,733 | 13 | 43 | 23.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Borna Coric | Bradley Klahn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #669 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #248 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #148 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #877 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |