H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Bradley Klahn vs Noah Rubin H2H: 1-0
Bradley Klahn holds a 1–0 lead over Noah Rubin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bradley Klahn leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bradley Klahn won the 2014 Winston-Salem second round 6-2 0-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2017 | Houston | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Noah Rubin | 6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | Bradley Klahn | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2014* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Bradley Klahn | 6-2 0-6 7-6(5) | Noah Rubin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradley Klahn | #1,096 | #63 | 731 | 1,733 | 13 | 43 | 23.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Noah Rubin | #1,126 | #125 | 456 | 1,692 | 8 | 21 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bradley Klahn | Noah Rubin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #604 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #669 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #248 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #148 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #250 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #877 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |