H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Casper Ruud vs Dusan Lajovic H2H: 3-1
Casper Ruud holds a 3–1 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Casper Ruud leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Casper Ruud won the 2024 Acapulco fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Norway
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2024* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Casper Ruud | 6-4 7-5 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
| May 4, 2022* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Dusan Lajovic | 7-6(7) 2-6 6-4 | Casper Ruud | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2021* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Casper Ruud | 6-4 6-3 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2020* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Casper Ruud | 7-5 6-1 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | #13 | #2 | 5,850 | 2,128 | 285 | 160 | 64.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Casper Ruud | Dusan Lajovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #54 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,048 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #11 | 1,891 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #6 | 1,915 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 14 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,930 | 0 | 14 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |