H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs Mikael Ymer H2H: 1-0
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe holds a 1–0 lead over Mikael Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cedrik-Marcel Stebe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedrik-Marcel Stebe won the 2019 Stockholm fourth round 6-0 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Sweden
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2019* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | 6-0 7-6(5) | Mikael Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | #366 | #71 | 688 | 1,756 | 29 | 49 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mikael Ymer | #626 | #50 | 981 | 1,861 | 58 | 74 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | Mikael Ymer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #596 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #255 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #177 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #94 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #82 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #165 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |