H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:15 UTC
Christopher O'Connell vs Dominic Thiem
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Christopher O'Connell vs Dominic Thiem.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher O'Connell | #127 | #53 | 930 | 1,820 | 62 | 96 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christopher O'Connell | Dominic Thiem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #393 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #120 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2022 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #78 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 2024 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #116 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |