H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Christopher O'Connell vs Filip Krajinovic H2H: 1-0
Christopher O'Connell holds a 1–0 lead over Filip Krajinovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Christopher O'Connell leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Christopher O'Connell won the 2023 Madrid Masters first round 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2023* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Clay | Christopher O'Connell | 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2 | Filip Krajinovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher O'Connell | #127 | #53 | 930 | 1,820 | 62 | 96 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Filip Krajinovic | #1,204 | #26 | 1,724 | 1,984 | 115 | 125 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christopher O'Connell | Filip Krajinovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #393 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #234 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #34 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #120 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #94 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #40 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #78 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #42 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #116 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #311 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |