H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Chun-Hsin Tseng vs Joao Sousa H2H: 0-2
Joao Sousa holds a 2–0 lead over Chun-Hsin Tseng in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joao Sousa leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joao Sousa won the 2022 Roland Garros first round 6-7(5) 6-1 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chinese Taipei
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Joao Sousa | 6-7(5) 6-1 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Chun-Hsin Tseng | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2019* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Joao Sousa | 6-4 7-5 | Chun-Hsin Tseng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chun-Hsin Tseng | #234 | #83 | 648 | 1,611 | 9 | 30 | 23.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chun-Hsin Tseng | Joao Sousa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #298 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 |