H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cristian Garin vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 1-1
Cristian Garin and Dominic Thiem are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cristian Garin leads 1–0 on clay, while Dominic Thiem leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cristian Garin won the 2023 Santiago third round 6-2 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2023* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Cristian Garin | 6-2 7-6(2) | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
| Oct 30, 2020* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 6-3 6-2 | Cristian Garin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristian Garin | #141 | #17 | 2,610 | 1,948 | 121 | 113 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cristian Garin | Dominic Thiem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #388 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2020 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2021 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #17 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #85 | 1,802 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | 2023 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #82 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2024 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #152 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2025 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 2026 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,591 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 |