H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Cristian Garin vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 1-1
Cristian Garin and Henri Laaksonen are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cristian Garin leads 1–0 on clay, while Henri Laaksonen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Henri Laaksonen won the 2021 US Open second round 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Henri Laaksonen | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 6-4 | Cristian Garin | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2019* | Houston | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Cristian Garin | 6-3 6-2 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
| May 19, 2013 | Nice | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Henri Laaksonen | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | Cristian Garin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristian Garin | #141 | #17 | 2,610 | 1,948 | 121 | 113 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cristian Garin | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #388 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #17 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #85 | 1,802 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #82 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #152 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,591 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |