H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 19:16 UTC
Cristian Garin vs Milos Raonic H2H: 0-1
Milos Raonic holds a 1–0 lead over Cristian Garin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2020 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Cristian Garin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristian Garin | #141 | #17 | 2,610 | 1,948 | 121 | 113 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cristian Garin | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #388 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2020 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2021 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #17 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #85 | 1,802 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2023 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #82 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2024 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #152 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2025 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2026 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,591 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |