H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Daniel Brands vs Kevin Kim H2H: 0-2

Kevin Kim holds a 2–0 lead over Daniel Brands in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kevin Kim leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kevin Kim won the 2010 Chennai round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Kevin Kim
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kevin Kim #117 6-2 6-2 Daniel Brands #92 Match data Jan 7, 2010* R32 Chennai ATP 250 Hard
Kevin Kim #81 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Daniel Brands #116 Match data Jul 10, 2009* R16 Newport ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kevin Kim #1,213 #63 866 1,642 44 97 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Brands Kevin Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
19 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0 1999 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0
21 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0 2000 2–5 28.6% #141 1,424 0 0
22 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0 2001 1–3 25.0% #184 1,392 0 0
23 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #238 1,430 0 0
24 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #219 1,453 0 0
25 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #94 1,550 0 0
26 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0 2005 19–25 43.2% #101 1,561 0 0
27 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0 2006 7–18 28.0% #101 1,546 0 0
28 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0 2007 3–14 17.6% #178 1,483 0 0
29 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #117 1,516 0 0
30 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0 2009 7–16 30.4% #117 1,598 0 0
31 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0 2010 1–3 25.0% #245 1,581 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Brands Kevin Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 15 17 32 46.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — — 36 68 104 34.6% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Brands Kevin Kim
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8% 2003 1/1 7.0 1.0 66.2% 68.9% 52.2% 0.0% 20.0% 63.2% 37.1%
25 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4% 2004 5/5 3.6 1.4 61.4% 66.2% 47.8% 59.8% 47.0% 59.1% 37.1%
26 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5% 2005 44/44 6.5 3.0 60.0% 70.8% 46.9% 60.9% 41.2% 61.3% 35.8%
27 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0% 2006 25/25 3.3 3.6 57.7% 66.7% 48.8% 48.4% 41.2% 59.3% 35.9%
28 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0% 2007 17/17 3.6 2.9 61.0% 68.4% 39.1% 41.4% 29.0% 57.0% 34.0%
29 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4% 2008 3/3 6.3 5.0 47.9% 69.6% 49.2% 71.6% 27.8% 59.6% 32.5%
30 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6% 2009 23/23 4.7 4.6 54.2% 71.5% 41.1% 48.2% 39.7% 57.5% 32.6%
31 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5% 2010 4/4 3.5 4.3 53.7% 72.6% 43.1% 61.9% 12.1% 59.0% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Brands Kevin Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1486 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — +0.03
19 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09 1999 1469 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — -0.04
21 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22 2000 1425 106.2 — — — — +31 — — 36.8% -1.00 1–3 (25%) — — +0.39
22 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34 2001 1392 103.2 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 — — +0.28
23 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41 2002 1430 106.3 — — — — +23 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
24 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51 2003 1453 101.1 -1.94 -2.05 1.009 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08
25 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24 2004 1550 107.7 -1.03 +1.02 0.909 47.9% -39 — — 36.4% -1.18 — — — -0.18
26 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62 2005 1562 124.4 -1.57 -1.25 0.924 48.7% +17 -35 -52 44.2% -0.30 7–7 (50%) 8–14 (36%) — +1.98
27 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11 2006 1546 126.0 -2.01 -0.63 0.882 47.5% -14 +9 — 34.9% -0.95 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.13
28 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06 2007 1484 113.2 -4.48 -1.97 0.789 45.2% +39 — — 23.8% -1.50 2–2 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.68
29 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08 2008 1517 103.8 -0.92 +0.78 0.805 46.6% — — — 12.5% -1.38 — — — -0.04
30 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04 2009 1599 124.8 -3.91 -1.54 0.767 45.5% +20 -104 -33 25.5% -1.45 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.72
31 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28 2010 1581 108.5 -1.08 -1.69 0.826 46.6% +31 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 0–1 — +0.11
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1553 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1546 104.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1535 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62 — 1642 118.6 -2.46 -1.16 0.859 47.2% +15 -38 -43 34.1% -0.93 14–21 (40%) 11–27 (29%) 90.4 +2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.