H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Daniel Brands vs Ruben Bemelmans H2H: 1-0

Daniel Brands holds a 1–0 lead over Ruben Bemelmans in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Brands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Brands won the 2012 Vienna Open first round 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Ruben Bemelmans
BEL Age 38 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ruben Bemelmans #193 6-1 6-4 6-7(2) 4-6 6-3 Daniel Brands #131 Match data Jun 28, 2016* Q3 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Daniel Brands #111 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 Ruben Bemelmans #109 Match data Oct 18, 2012* R32 Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard
Daniel Brands #182 7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(4) Ruben Bemelmans #151 Match data Oct 25, 2011* Q3 Q Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard
Ruben Bemelmans #245 6-3 7-6(3) Daniel Brands #122 Match data Jun 23, 2009* Q2 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

3 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ruben Bemelmans #1,092 #84 628 1,756 23 49 31.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Brands Ruben Bemelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0 2010 1–4 20.0% #178 1,597 0 0
23 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0 2011 1–3 25.0% #160 1,634 0 0
24 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0 2012 3–6 33.3% #111 1,648 0 0
25 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0 2013 3–5 37.5% #148 1,637 0 0
26 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0 2015 3–8 27.3% #108 1,695 0 0
28 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0 2016 2–2 50.0% #167 1,645 0 0
29 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0 2017 5–5 50.0% #118 1,694 0 0
30 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0 2018 5–14 26.3% #117 1,686 0 0
31 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0 2019 0–2 0.0% #260 1,590 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Brands Ruben Bemelmans
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2012 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2013 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
26 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2015 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 3 11 14 21.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2% — 16 32 48 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 14 20 30.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Brands Ruben Bemelmans
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5% 2010 5/5 7.0 1.0 67.7% 70.3% 43.5% 71.5% 35.7% 61.8% 32.4%
23 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0% 2011 4/4 4.5 4.5 58.7% 73.6% 49.1% 67.8% 37.1% 63.3% 34.2%
24 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8% 2012 9/9 5.7 3.7 60.7% 68.7% 48.3% 56.0% 49.7% 60.7% 35.4%
25 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4% 2013 8/8 8.0 3.3 65.0% 73.1% 50.6% 69.6% 37.6% 65.5% 36.9%
26 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0% 2015 11/11 7.3 4.5 62.0% 72.0% 51.2% 51.1% 35.3% 64.2% 30.8%
28 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0% 2016 4/4 6.5 2.3 68.6% 65.9% 50.7% 76.7% 55.0% 61.0% 31.2%
29 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4% 2017 10/10 6.6 2.4 65.3% 68.5% 53.9% 53.6% 31.4% 63.1% 32.1%
30 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6% 2018 19/19 5.8 3.2 65.4% 66.5% 47.0% 59.4% 38.4% 59.9% 33.4%
31 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5% 2019 2/2 0.5 1.5 65.5% 57.5% 42.9% 48.7% 25.0% 52.5% 28.0%
Career — 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4% — 72/72 6.3 3.2 64.2% 69.0% 49.1% 60.0% 38.6% 61.9% 33.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Brands Ruben Bemelmans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22 2009 1500 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34 2010 1597 122.5 +0.88 -0.33 0.848 47.3% +32 — — 38.5% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.22
23 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41 2011 1634 112.3 +0.10 -0.35 0.931 49.4% — — +60 46.2% -0.61 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.05
24 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51 2012 1648 118.1 -1.91 -0.07 0.901 48.3% -38 — +135 40.0% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.13
25 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24 2013 1638 125.5 +0.65 0.00 1.070 51.5% +20 — — 42.9% +0.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.14
26 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62 2014 1628 113.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11 2015 1695 124.5 -1.03 -1.29 0.860 47.4% +26 — — 27.6% -1.28 0–2 2–4 (33%) — -0.88
28 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06 2016 1646 110.6 -0.49 -2.17 0.800 48.0% +6 — — 46.2% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.19
29 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08 2017 1694 125.7 -0.20 -0.85 0.870 48.1% -61 — +90 41.9% -0.45 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.25
30 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04 2018 1686 128.9 -2.91 -1.28 0.833 47.2% -22 — +111 35.2% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.61
31 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28 2019 1590 108.5 -1.92 +0.26 0.590 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.40 — — — -0.16
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1599 107.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1552 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1518 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62 — 1756 123.9 -1.13 -0.82 0.871 48.0% -8 — +101 37.3% -0.70 9–20 (31%) 15–23 (39%) 89.1 -2.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.