H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Dudi Sela H2H: 0-1

Dudi Sela holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dudi Sela leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dudi Sela won the 2015 Eastbourne Open first round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Dudi Sela
ISR Age 41 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dudi Sela #85 7-5 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #62 Match data Jun 23, 2015* R64 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dudi Sela #1,031 #29 1,397 1,803 121 170 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Dudi Sela
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #170 1,543 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2007 5–4 55.6% #64 1,626 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2008 14–22 38.9% #112 1,684 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2009 15–20 42.9% #43 1,647 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2010 15–17 46.9% #75 1,711 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2011 6–13 31.6% #83 1,661 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2012 11–17 39.3% #109 1,650 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2013 4–7 36.4% #73 1,676 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2014 16–19 45.7% #98 1,711 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2015 7–9 43.8% #100 1,716 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 2016 10–17 37.0% #96 1,710 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 2017 13–15 46.4% #67 1,791 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2018 5–8 38.5% #236 1,747 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #142 1,684 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Dudi Sela
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2007 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2008 12 15 27 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 9 14 23 39.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2010 10 11 21 47.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2012 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2013 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — 88 115 203 43.3% 7 27 34 20.6% 26 28 54 48.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 287/291 of Dudi Sela's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Dudi Sela
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% 2005 1/1 0.0 5.0 62.0% 40.8% 40.0% 50.0% 33.3% 40.5% 37.3%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2007 9/9 3.6 3.6 61.8% 68.5% 49.9% 50.2% 37.4% 61.7% 42.5%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2008 34/36 1.7 2.5 62.6% 66.9% 49.4% 60.0% 41.7% 60.1% 38.0%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2009 35/35 2.2 2.3 59.8% 66.0% 51.1% 51.1% 41.9% 60.1% 37.6%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2010 32/32 2.2 2.8 58.3% 66.6% 50.4% 52.0% 46.7% 59.8% 37.8%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2011 19/19 3.3 3.4 58.2% 67.3% 49.9% 58.7% 45.4% 60.0% 36.7%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2012 28/28 2.4 2.6 60.2% 68.0% 52.3% 56.7% 36.4% 61.7% 37.8%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2013 11/11 1.5 3.5 61.2% 63.0% 44.1% 48.5% 37.8% 55.6% 38.2%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2014 35/35 1.7 3.1 59.7% 68.1% 51.8% 52.9% 39.3% 61.5% 38.8%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2015 16/16 2.9 3.0 59.2% 66.5% 51.2% 64.0% 33.7% 60.2% 36.7%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% 2016 25/27 2.7 3.6 56.3% 65.6% 50.8% 53.6% 41.8% 59.1% 37.7%
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% 2017 28/28 2.6 2.7 61.8% 69.6% 52.5% 53.2% 43.7% 62.9% 38.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 13/13 3.2 4.5 58.8% 66.1% 45.9% 52.5% 42.7% 57.4% 39.8%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 1.0 5.0 64.4% 55.3% 38.1% 42.9% 0.0% 49.2% 26.1%
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 287/291 2.3 3.0 59.8% 66.9% 50.4% 54.6% 41.1% 60.2% 38.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Dudi Sela
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 2003 1521 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 2005 1543 106.8 +2.83 +7.18 0.628 39.0% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.33
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1492 99.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20 2007 1627 119.0 -0.17 +2.96 1.110 51.8% +12 — — 50.0% -0.23 0–1 1–1 — -0.29
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24 2008 1685 138.4 -1.79 +1.47 0.953 49.1% +36 -163 -236 41.9% -0.42 2–5 (29%) 7–5 (58%) — -2.03
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95 2009 1647 129.7 -2.45 +0.36 0.942 48.7% -11 -131 -17 46.7% -0.32 3–7 (30%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.84
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72 2010 1712 132.6 -2.85 +1.42 0.941 48.7% -18 -206 -53 44.6% -0.49 3–1 (75%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.38
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11 2011 1662 126.9 -1.94 -0.50 0.917 48.4% -1 — -21 37.7% -0.45 3–6 (33%) 1–6 (14%) — +0.61
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22 2012 1651 136.3 -1.77 +0.54 0.987 49.5% +24 -176 +21 38.2% -0.41 5–4 (56%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.64
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44 2013 1676 118.6 -4.03 -0.28 0.860 47.0% +30 — — 40.6% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.37
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04 2014 1712 138.8 -3.34 +2.71 1.008 50.1% +51 -281 -89 44.6% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.00
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22 2015 1717 121.8 -2.23 +0.28 0.922 48.6% -20 — -66 44.4% -0.73 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.14
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2016 1710 134.3 -3.21 +0.93 0.923 48.5% -46 -251 +31 42.7% -0.56 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) — -1.19
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 2017 1792 145.3 -0.94 +1.79 1.028 50.6% -51 — -19 52.2% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.09
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1748 131.5 -3.65 +2.94 0.933 48.6% -23 — +56 40.0% -0.86 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.71
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1684 95.7 -1.19 -2.70 0.513 39.0% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.07
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1636 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1627 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1557 90.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1804 138.0 -2.35 +1.23 0.956 49.1% +1 -199 -29 43.4% -0.43 30–46 (39%) 50–49 (51%) 98.8 -0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.