H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Frederico Gil H2H: 1-1

Daniel Gimeno-Traver and Frederico Gil are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay, while Frederico Gil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2009 Swedish Open first round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Frederico Gil
POR Age 41 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #107 7-5 6-4 Frederico Gil Match data May 6, 2012 Q2 Q Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #91 6-1 6-4 Frederico Gil Match data Jul 16, 2009* R32 Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay
Frederico Gil 6-1 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #105 Match data Jun 10, 2009* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Frederico Gil — — — 1,782 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Frederico Gil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Frederico Gil
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 8 6 14 57.1% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2010 1 7 8 12.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — 16 24 40 40.0% 32 35 67 47.8% 1 7 8 12.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 114/115 of Frederico Gil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Frederico Gil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/3 1.0 0.5 77.9% 57.4% 37.0% 66.7% 25.0% 53.5% 36.2%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2007 3/3 2.3 2.3 62.3% 62.4% 51.3% 37.5% 35.0% 58.3% 36.2%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2008 6/6 3.0 2.7 68.3% 67.6% 51.0% 65.9% 36.3% 62.0% 35.0%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2009 33/33 3.1 2.3 61.2% 68.2% 50.7% 55.6% 44.1% 61.5% 36.6%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2010 21/21 2.1 2.0 66.6% 59.7% 47.4% 54.7% 43.4% 55.5% 36.3%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2011 27/27 2.3 1.9 64.6% 63.7% 47.7% 51.8% 41.4% 57.9% 38.3%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2012 22/22 1.7 1.9 62.8% 64.7% 50.9% 56.4% 41.3% 59.4% 37.4%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Frederico Gil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1539 103.7 +0.35 +0.51 0.779 46.2% — +27 — 50.0% -0.75 2–0 1–0 — -0.19
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20 2007 1593 115.1 +0.47 -1.50 0.868 47.1% — +24 — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–2 — -0.26
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24 2008 1624 117.9 -1.81 +1.60 0.920 48.5% — +37 — 38.9% -0.67 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.04
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95 2009 1656 139.8 -1.33 -0.33 0.951 49.1% +1 +25 -42 45.0% -0.32 7–3 (70%) 6–7 (46%) 105.0 -0.88
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72 2010 1613 122.3 -4.71 -0.35 0.816 46.3% -32 +111 — 36.7% -0.86 5–2 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 106.2 +0.07
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11 2011 1624 132.4 -2.73 +0.39 0.910 48.2% +26 +81 — 37.7% -0.71 4–6 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 95.4 -0.33
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22 2012 1610 123.8 -2.31 +0.07 0.921 48.6% +64 +46 — 41.2% -0.57 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 100.7 +0.42
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44 2013 1572 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04 2014 1536 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22 2015 1534 104.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1542 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1783 130.2 -2.42 0.00 0.901 48.1% +13 +59 -42 40.6% -0.59 23–15 (61%) 15–20 (43%) 104.8 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.