H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Guilherme Clezar H2H: 1-0

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Guilherme Clezar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2016 Sao Paulo round of 32 3-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Guilherme Clezar
BRA Age 33 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #99 3-6 6-4 6-1 Guilherme Clezar #173 Match data Feb 25, 2016* R32 Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #118 6-3 6-2 Guilherme Clezar #173 Match data Feb 15, 2016 Q1 Q Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 Clay
Guilherme Clezar #171 6-3 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #116 Match data Feb 8, 2016 Q1 Q Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Guilherme Clezar #1,365 #153 334 1,568 1 11 8.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Guilherme Clezar
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #287 1,483 0 0
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #158 1,471 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2014 0–2 0.0% #253 1,465 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2015 0–3 0.0% #175 1,529 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2016 0–2 0.0% #220 1,513 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2017 0–1 0.0% #205 1,546 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2018 1–1 50.0% #232 1,539 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Guilherme Clezar
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2018 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 10 11 9.1% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Guilherme Clezar
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% 2011 1/1 3.0 1.0 75.9% 56.1% 46.2% 40.0% 0.0% 53.7% 20.8%
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% 2013 1/1 6.0 3.0 59.8% 68.4% 51.0% 78.6% 66.7% 61.4% 34.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 2/2 3.5 1.5 64.7% 67.2% 28.1% 25.0% 0.0% 53.4% 25.7%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2015 3/3 3.7 3.3 60.5% 63.4% 44.9% 49.1% 52.9% 56.4% 38.3%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2016 2/2 7.5 6.0 59.6% 65.4% 41.2% 43.6% 44.2% 55.3% 38.1%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2017 1/1 1.0 1.0 52.7% 48.3% 50.0% 55.6% 33.3% 49.1% 25.5%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2018 2/2 9.0 4.0 66.6% 70.1% 49.1% 53.6% 8.8% 62.2% 33.8%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 12/12 5.1 3.2 62.7% 64.0% 43.2% 47.2% 30.4% 56.3% 32.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Guilherme Clezar
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 2011 1484 97.9 -0.89 -3.41 0.450 38.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.25
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 2012 1448 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 2013 1472 112.2 -1.47 -2.03 0.904 49.2% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — -0.07
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1465 105.7 -1.13 -1.44 0.551 39.3% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.05
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20 2015 1529 114.9 -2.10 -0.46 0.879 47.5% — +100 — 25.0% -1.25 0–2 0–1 — -0.02
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24 2016 1514 110.7 -2.12 -1.51 0.853 46.5% — — — 28.6% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.27
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95 2017 1546 113.6 +0.38 -1.49 0.502 38.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.05
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72 2018 1540 113.5 -2.17 -0.79 0.895 47.3% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — 0.00
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11 2019 1507 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44 2021 1478 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1568 114.5 -1.59 -1.32 0.746 44.5% — +100 — 22.6% -1.65 1–4 (20%) 0–4 (0%) — +4.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.