H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Kevin Kim

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Kevin Kim.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Kevin Kim
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kevin Kim #116 4-6 6-4 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #178 Match data May 30, 2006* Q2 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kevin Kim #1,213 #63 866 1,642 44 97 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Kevin Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 1999 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2000 2–5 28.6% #141 1,424 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2001 1–3 25.0% #184 1,392 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #238 1,430 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #219 1,453 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #94 1,550 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2005 19–25 43.2% #101 1,561 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2006 7–18 28.0% #101 1,546 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2007 3–14 17.6% #178 1,483 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #117 1,516 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2009 7–16 30.4% #117 1,598 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 2010 1–3 25.0% #245 1,581 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Kevin Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2002 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 15 17 32 46.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2007 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — — — 36 68 104 34.6% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Kevin Kim
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2003 1/1 7.0 1.0 66.2% 68.9% 52.2% 0.0% 20.0% 63.2% 37.1%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2004 5/5 3.6 1.4 61.4% 66.2% 47.8% 59.8% 47.0% 59.1% 37.1%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2005 44/44 6.5 3.0 60.0% 70.8% 46.9% 60.9% 41.2% 61.3% 35.8%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2006 25/25 3.3 3.6 57.7% 66.7% 48.8% 48.4% 41.2% 59.3% 35.9%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2007 17/17 3.6 2.9 61.0% 68.4% 39.1% 41.4% 29.0% 57.0% 34.0%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2008 3/3 6.3 5.0 47.9% 69.6% 49.2% 71.6% 27.8% 59.6% 32.5%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2009 23/23 4.7 4.6 54.2% 71.5% 41.1% 48.2% 39.7% 57.5% 32.6%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% 2010 4/4 3.5 4.3 53.7% 72.6% 43.1% 61.9% 12.1% 59.0% 33.9%
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 122/141 4.9 3.4 58.2% 69.6% 45.1% 53.0% 38.0% 59.4% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Kevin Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1486 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — +0.03
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 1999 1469 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — -0.04
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1425 106.2 — — — — +31 — — 36.8% -1.00 1–3 (25%) — — +0.39
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20 2001 1392 103.2 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 — — +0.28
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24 2002 1430 106.3 — — — — +23 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95 2003 1453 101.1 -1.94 -2.05 1.009 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72 2004 1550 107.7 -1.03 +1.02 0.909 47.9% -39 — — 36.4% -1.18 — — — -0.18
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11 2005 1562 124.4 -1.57 -1.25 0.924 48.7% +17 -35 -52 44.2% -0.30 7–7 (50%) 8–14 (36%) 97.4 +1.98
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22 2006 1546 126.0 -2.01 -0.63 0.882 47.5% -14 +9 — 34.9% -0.95 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.13
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44 2007 1484 113.2 -4.48 -1.97 0.789 45.2% +39 — — 23.8% -1.50 2–2 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 97.7 +0.68
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04 2008 1517 103.8 -0.92 +0.78 0.805 46.6% — — — 12.5% -1.38 — — — -0.04
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22 2009 1599 124.8 -3.91 -1.54 0.767 45.5% +20 -104 -33 25.5% -1.45 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.72
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2010 1581 108.5 -1.08 -1.69 0.826 46.6% +31 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 0–1 — +0.11
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 2011 1553 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1546 104.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1535 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1642 118.6 -2.46 -1.16 0.859 47.2% +15 -38 -43 34.1% -0.93 14–21 (40%) 11–27 (29%) 90.4 +2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.