H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-0

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2013 Indian Wells Open first round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #52 6-1 6-4 Lukas Lacko #81 Match data Mar 9, 2013* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) 101.4 -0.83
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 101.1 -0.54
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 -0.47
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 103.0 -0.64
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.19
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 -0.16
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +1.00
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.