H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 2-4

Lukasz Kubot holds a 4–2 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Lukasz Kubot leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2014 Qatar Open first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main-draw meetings
Lukasz Kubot
POL Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukasz Kubot #83 2-6 6-1 7-6(4) Daniel Gimeno-Traver #102 Match data Apr 13, 2014 Q1 Q Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Lukasz Kubot #72 6-4 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #77 Match data Jan 1, 2014* R32 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Lukasz Kubot #70 7-6(6) 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #71 Match data Oct 24, 2013* R32 Swiss Indoors ATP 500 Hard
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #71 6-7(4) 6-4 6-0 4-6 6-4 Lukasz Kubot #76 Match data Jan 16, 2013* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #93 6-4 7-6(5) Lukasz Kubot #76 Match data Sep 21, 2012* R16 St. Petersburg ATP 250 Hard
Lukasz Kubot #69 7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #60 Match data Jul 14, 2011* R32 Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Clay
Lukasz Kubot #197 7-6(7) 1-6 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #90 Match data Feb 12, 2009* R32 Costa Do Sauipe ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lukasz Kubot #1,054 #41 977 1,870 82 120 40.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Lukasz Kubot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #219 1,514 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #142 1,484 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2006 3–7 30.0% #125 1,552 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #222 1,485 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2009 9–9 50.0% #101 1,730 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2010 15–24 38.5% #70 1,653 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2011 17–17 50.0% #57 1,818 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2012 21–27 43.8% #74 1,716 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 2013 10–17 37.0% #72 1,667 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 2014 5–12 29.4% #170 1,670 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2015 1–2 33.3% #471 1,698 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Lukasz Kubot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — — — 33 62 95 34.7% 36 45 81 44.4% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 199/202 of Lukasz Kubot's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Lukasz Kubot
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2004 2/2 1.5 3.0 62.7% 73.6% 41.1% 52.8% 16.7% 61.9% 40.0%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2005 1/1 0.0 1.0 83.0% 47.7% 55.6% 20.0% 0.0% 49.1% 27.5%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2006 10/10 3.3 4.3 61.6% 62.6% 44.2% 52.3% 33.1% 55.4% 33.8%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2007 3/3 2.7 2.0 60.8% 58.5% 40.6% 21.7% 46.8% 50.4% 41.3%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2009 18/18 4.2 3.0 62.5% 70.6% 49.6% 57.5% 37.8% 63.0% 36.1%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2010 38/39 4.6 4.7 62.5% 66.5% 45.5% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 37.0%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2011 34/34 5.1 5.8 61.4% 70.1% 46.4% 56.6% 52.7% 60.9% 37.0%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2012 47/48 4.3 4.3 61.4% 69.3% 48.3% 58.0% 39.7% 61.2% 37.0%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% 2013 26/27 6.5 4.5 62.6% 67.8% 45.0% 52.0% 41.4% 59.2% 37.1%
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% 2014 17/17 7.6 5.7 59.9% 69.1% 48.8% 57.0% 33.4% 60.8% 32.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 3/3 8.0 4.3 65.8% 68.0% 54.5% 69.4% 14.3% 63.4% 31.7%
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 199/202 5.0 4.6 61.9% 68.2% 46.9% 55.2% 41.9% 60.1% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Lukasz Kubot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20 2004 1514 104.6 +0.89 +0.01 1.051 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.09
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24 2005 1484 98.6 +2.62 -3.59 0.539 38.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95 2006 1552 111.5 -2.84 -0.81 0.759 45.1% +43 — — 36.7% -1.37 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.02
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72 2007 1486 99.1 -3.22 -0.28 0.831 45.7% — — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 — — +0.02
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11 2008 1507 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22 2009 1730 130.5 -0.39 +0.74 0.974 49.4% -21 -13 — 51.2% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 -0.34
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44 2010 1653 134.9 -3.52 +0.17 0.895 48.1% +52 -19 -182 41.7% -0.46 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 92.0 +0.09
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04 2011 1819 141.7 -1.34 -0.12 0.947 49.2% -93 -18 -86 49.0% -0.07 10–7 (59%) 11–7 (61%) 109.1 +0.47
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22 2012 1716 137.7 -1.80 +0.15 0.952 49.5% -31 +48 -3 45.8% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 8–10 (44%) 99.9 +0.63
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2013 1667 126.1 -3.42 -0.55 0.908 48.2% -63 +74 +118 41.1% -0.52 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 96.6 +1.16
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 2014 1670 124.3 -1.32 -2.59 0.827 47.1% -101 +15 +100 40.8% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–3 (50%) 95.1 -0.27
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1698 119.7 -2.83 +2.52 0.866 48.0% -40 — — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1654 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1871 133.5 -2.13 -0.20 0.909 48.4% -30 +7 +8 43.9% -0.40 26–45 (37%) 39–39 (50%) 98.9 +0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.