H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Sam Groth H2H: 1-0

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Sam Groth in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2015 Indian Wells Open first round 7-6(5) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Sam Groth
AUS Age 38 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #94 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Sam Groth #69 Match data Mar 14, 2015* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sam Groth #1,155 #53 843 1,849 36 58 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Sam Groth
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #278 1,556 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 1–2 33.3% #279 1,548 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2013 1–3 25.0% #172 1,553 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2014 9–13 40.9% #81 1,707 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2015 18–21 46.2% #60 1,796 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2016 4–15 21.1% #180 1,636 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2017 2–3 40.0% #248 1,594 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Sam Groth
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2008 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2013 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2014 6 11 17 35.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2015 12 15 27 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2016 2 11 13 15.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — 22 42 64 34.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 13 12 25 52.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 93/94 of Sam Groth's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Sam Groth
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% 2008 2/2 19.0 6.0 54.6% 87.5% 56.2% 78.6% 37.5% 72.7% 33.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 10.3 8.3 49.4% 71.0% 48.2% 60.8% 100.0% 59.3% 28.8%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2013 4/4 15.5 5.0 64.1% 72.9% 54.7% 64.2% 24.1% 65.9% 32.3%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2014 22/22 15.6 4.2 61.8% 81.6% 54.3% 67.8% 30.8% 71.1% 28.8%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2015 39/39 16.0 4.6 61.6% 78.8% 51.4% 66.5% 26.3% 68.1% 28.5%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2016 18/19 14.8 5.8 58.0% 77.3% 46.6% 63.5% 44.8% 64.2% 29.4%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2017 5/5 15.8 6.4 56.3% 79.2% 48.1% 67.4% 39.9% 65.9% 26.2%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 93/94 15.5 5.0 60.2% 78.9% 51.1% 66.3% 34.2% 67.6% 28.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Sam Groth
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 2008 1557 104.1 +1.47 -1.35 1.219 53.0% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 2–0 — +0.15
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1548 110.5 -1.72 -0.48 0.708 45.0% — — — 33.3% -1.44 1–0 1–0 — +0.28
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20 2010 1527 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24 2011 1493 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95 2012 1479 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72 2013 1553 113.3 -1.09 +0.67 0.946 49.0% -20 — — 40.0% -0.60 0–2 2–0 — -0.22
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11 2014 1708 131.6 +4.20 -3.96 0.998 49.9% -73 — +91 41.8% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 11–13 (46%) — +0.17
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22 2015 1797 142.6 +2.73 -5.23 0.895 48.7% -77 -215 +92 46.9% -0.37 6–8 (43%) 18–13 (58%) — -0.77
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44 2016 1636 125.3 +0.82 -4.85 0.819 47.1% -67 — +169 24.4% -1.29 0–2 2–11 (15%) — -1.24
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04 2017 1594 116.2 -0.83 -1.85 0.767 47.3% -41 — — 35.7% -0.86 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22 2018 1572 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1849 129.9 +2.18 -4.18 0.894 48.6% -69 -215 +113 40.3% -0.56 12–17 (41%) 37–39 (49%) 98.2 -2.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.