H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Carlos Costa H2H: 1-1
Daniel Vacek and Carlos Costa are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on carpet, while Carlos Costa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Costa won the 1995 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1995* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Carlos Costa | 6-1 7-5 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1994* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 6-3 6-7(7) 6-1 | Carlos Costa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carlos Costa | #1,297 | #10 | 1,663 | 1,960 | 237 | 201 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Carlos Costa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #201 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #151 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #55 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #14 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,675 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #31 | 1,756 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #61 | 1,659 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,629 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #472 | 1,474 | 0 | 6 |