H2H data updated: 2026-10-18 00:00 UTC

Daniel Vacek vs Johan Van Herck H2H: 1-0

Daniel Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Johan Van Herck in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1995 Toulouse round of 16 6-3 7-6(11).

CZE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
BEL Age 52 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Vacek #54 6-3 7-6(11) Johan Van Herck Match data Oct 6, 1995* R16 Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Vacek #1,133 #26 1,151 1,821 171 220 43.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johan Van Herck — — — 1,662 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Vacek Johan Van Herck
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1991 1–3 25.0% #470 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1993 13–22 37.1% #114 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1994 25–27 48.1% #45 1,732 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1995 30–31 49.2% #27 1,797 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1996 23–29 44.2% #71 1,692 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1997 19–26 42.2% #53 1,669 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1998 25–29 46.3% #50 1,671 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1999 29–31 48.3% #43 1,740 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2000 4–13 23.5% #238 1,628 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2001 2–7 22.2% #393 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 0–2 0.0% #749 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Vacek Johan Van Herck
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1993 7 9 16 43.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
23 1994 10 11 21 47.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1995 11 11 22 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 1998 0 7 7 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1996 10 11 21 47.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 17 17 34 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 20 17 37 54.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 87 105 192 45.3% 22 42 64 34.4% 17 23 40 42.5% 45 50 95 47.4% — 12 25 37 32.4% 22 25 47 46.8% 0 6 6 0.0% 10 15 25 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Vacek Johan Van Herck
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1493 102.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1492 110.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.20
20 1991 1490 102.2 -1.04 -0.09 0.834 46.2% — — — 22.2% -1.67 — 1–0 — +0.10 1994 1502 120.0 — — — — +20 — — 22.2% -1.33 1–0 0–2 — -0.38
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1506 105.8 — — — — +29 +8 — 33.3% -0.90 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.48
22 1993 1560 126.4 +2.79 -4.51 0.922 49.1% -2 +9 -4 41.1% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 7–9 (44%) 97.5 +0.29 1996 1598 121.9 — — — — -12 -12 — 44.2% -0.64 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 98.4 +0.80
23 1994 1732 143.4 +3.08 -2.24 0.992 49.9% -14 -131 -90 47.5% -0.12 12–9 (57%) 13–15 (46%) 103.3 -1.41 1997 1632 127.8 — — — — -26 -9 — 44.3% -0.41 3–5 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 99.7 -1.24
24 1995 1798 148.9 +3.89 -1.17 1.046 50.7% +14 -171 -195 48.7% +0.03 10–11 (48%) 15–18 (45%) 98.8 -1.99 1998 1523 114.8 — — — — +23 +65 — 41.4% -0.67 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) 97.5 +0.49
25 1996 1692 140.7 +2.32 -3.52 0.945 49.3% +10 -77 -50 45.5% -0.25 12–11 (52%) 14–11 (56%) 101.0 -2.02 1999 1536 113.2 — — — — — +46 — 47.1% -0.29 1–2 (33%) — — +0.16
26 1997 1670 134.8 -0.60 -1.91 0.906 48.1% +38 -50 -60 41.8% -0.61 6–7 (46%) 13–12 (52%) 100.7 -0.33 2000 1554 103.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 1672 143.3 +0.67 -1.11 0.956 49.4% +16 -20 -40 48.1% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 13–10 (57%) 102.7 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1741 133.9 -1.09 -1.27 0.909 48.6% +1 -191 -65 46.2% -0.17 9–4 (69%) 7–11 (39%) 104.5 +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1629 122.6 -4.37 -4.38 0.659 42.4% +53 -125 — 27.5% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1595 122.1 -0.70 -2.81 0.721 45.3% +49 — — 23.8% -1.67 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1578 111.7 +0.38 -0.21 0.865 46.5% — — — 16.7% -1.17 — 0–2 — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1822 143.7 +1.22 -2.21 0.930 48.9% +12 -96 -70 44.3% -0.37 59–59 (50%) 88–91 (49%) 102.9 -1.71 — 1662 125.2 — — — — -1 +17 — 41.6% -0.63 10–20 (33%) 20–22 (48%) 95.0 +0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.