H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Nicolas Pereira H2H: 1-1
Daniel Vacek and Nicolas Pereira are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Pereira won the 1996 Washington second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1996* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Pereira | 6-3 6-3 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 7-6(3) | Nicolas Pereira | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicolas Pereira | #1,101 | #74 | 658 | 1,689 | 63 | 114 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Nicolas Pereira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #142 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #122 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #110 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |