H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Stefano Pescosolido H2H: 1-1
Daniel Vacek and Stefano Pescosolido are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stefano Pescosolido leads 1–0 on clay, while Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1996 Adelaide third round 4-6 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1996* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | Stefano Pescosolido | Match data |
| May 26, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Stefano Pescosolido | 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stefano Pescosolido | #1,500 | #42 | 781 | 1,763 | 107 | 155 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Stefano Pescosolido | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #739 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #225 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #141 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #65 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #113 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #68 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #193 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #233 | 1,467 | 0 | 2 |