H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 4-0

David Ferrer holds a 4–0 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2014 Bastad fourth round 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 11, 2014* Bastad ATP 250 R16 Clay David Ferrer #7 6-4 6-0 Victor Hanescu #104 Match data
May 4, 2013* Estoril ATP 250 QF Clay David Ferrer #4 6-4 7-6(2) Victor Hanescu #54 Match data
Apr 22, 2011* Barcelona ATP 500 R16 Clay David Ferrer #6 6-3 6-2 Victor Hanescu #66 Match data
Jun 23, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass David Ferrer #49 7-6(5) 6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 Victor Hanescu #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Victor Hanescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —