H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
David Goffin vs Dusan Lajovic H2H: 1-1
David Goffin and Dusan Lajovic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dusan Lajovic leads 1–0 on clay, while David Goffin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dusan Lajovic won the 2019 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2019* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Dusan Lajovic | 6-3 6-4 | David Goffin | Match data |
| Nov 5, 2015* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | David Goffin | 6-2 6-2 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Goffin | Dusan Lajovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |