H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 0-1

Victor Hanescu holds a 1–0 lead over David Nalbandian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Victor Hanescu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victor Hanescu won the 2005 Roland Garros round of 16 6-3 4-6 5-7 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 45 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victor Hanescu #90 6-3 4-6 5-7 6-1 6-2 David Nalbandian #11 Match data Jun 1, 2005* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 187 228 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Victor Hanescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 2004 17–24 41.5% #92 1,560 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,726 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,651 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 2008 21–22 48.8% #50 1,759 0 1
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,706 0 1
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,688 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,734 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Victor Hanescu
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2002 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2003 2 3 5 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2004 4 8 12 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 16 9 25 64.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 10 14 24 41.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2009 9 17 26 34.6% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2010 8 10 18 44.4% 13 13 26 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 2 7 9 22.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2013 4 14 18 22.2% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 4 7 11 36.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% — 52 97 149 34.9% 121 106 227 53.3% 13 19 32 40.6% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 408/415 of Victor Hanescu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Victor Hanescu
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% 2002 5/6 2.8 1.6 60.7% 63.8% 54.1% 61.2% 48.1% 59.8% 38.9%
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% 2003 25/25 4.1 2.3 65.8% 70.6% 50.5% 63.4% 48.4% 64.0% 36.3%
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% 2004 40/41 6.5 2.3 67.5% 69.3% 50.8% 63.0% 45.0% 63.2% 35.3%
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% 2005 47/47 5.5 1.4 68.9% 69.0% 51.8% 70.5% 41.2% 63.4% 36.2%
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 2006 6/6 5.2 2.8 64.0% 60.4% 48.5% 47.6% 37.8% 56.3% 33.4%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 2007 12/14 4.3 0.8 72.3% 74.1% 51.9% 69.3% 27.0% 67.9% 34.5%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% 2008 40/43 5.6 1.6 69.2% 71.7% 52.4% 60.3% 44.5% 65.6% 33.9%
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2009 56/56 4.6 1.7 69.2% 69.7% 51.5% 62.3% 41.8% 64.0% 36.6%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% 2010 47/47 6.2 1.6 71.8% 71.0% 50.9% 60.8% 34.6% 65.3% 35.4%
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2011 40/40 3.9 1.8 67.2% 69.6% 50.1% 47.9% 43.3% 63.3% 36.8%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 2012 19/19 3.3 1.0 72.5% 65.7% 48.9% 58.7% 41.8% 61.5% 34.7%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% 2013 43/43 3.6 1.1 70.4% 68.7% 50.1% 56.0% 37.4% 63.3% 34.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 26/26 3.6 1.7 70.6% 67.4% 44.8% 59.5% 35.3% 60.8% 34.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 2/2 8.0 1.0 62.6% 80.9% 60.3% 80.0% 25.0% 73.0% 34.6%
Career — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% — 408/415 4.8 1.6 69.1% 69.5% 50.6% 60.6% 40.7% 63.7% 35.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Victor Hanescu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) 112.4 -0.80 2002 1520 111.3 -1.52 +0.27 0.969 49.8% — +31 — 45.5% +0.18 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) 100.0 +0.37 2003 1667 132.9 +1.94 -0.77 1.011 50.6% -105 +5 -57 53.1% +0.31 2–3 (40%) 4–6 (40%) 98.4 -0.42
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) 99.8 +0.96 2004 1560 128.8 -0.24 -1.30 0.958 49.7% -32 +93 +47 46.5% -0.03 6–8 (43%) 8–15 (35%) 97.3 +0.44
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) 93.3 +0.79 2005 1726 141.2 +1.10 -0.69 0.991 50.2% -160 +87 -103 53.4% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 8–13 (38%) 102.6 -1.50
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 92.8 +0.24 2006 1652 114.7 -3.84 +0.04 0.766 45.3% -130 — — 27.8% -1.22 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.83
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 +0.27 2007 1684 130.9 +2.01 -1.85 1.073 50.8% — +100 — 45.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.76
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) 111.1 +1.15 2008 1759 132.7 +1.60 -1.73 0.986 49.9% -112 +21 -132 48.6% -0.22 8–8 (50%) 16–11 (59%) 105.5 +0.07
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 +0.35 2009 1707 142.8 +0.72 -0.19 1.018 50.3% -92 +118 -52 49.3% +0.07 7–9 (44%) 8–13 (38%) 97.5 +0.84
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 103.7 -1.13 2010 1707 144.8 +1.68 -1.00 1.022 50.3% -64 +74 -20 50.8% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 13–12 (52%) 99.5 +1.47
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 -0.83 2011 1688 139.6 +0.41 -0.16 1.005 49.9% -77 +67 +2 44.4% -0.26 5–10 (33%) 9–9 (50%) 99.1 -1.38
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) 99.7 -2.55 2012 1618 128.5 -0.92 -2.05 0.900 48.2% -12 +62 — 33.3% -1.04 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.65
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77 2013 1688 146.6 +0.21 -1.64 0.946 48.9% -114 +151 — 37.8% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 8–14 (36%) 93.7 -0.88
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1735 145.7 -1.09 -0.75 0.889 48.4% -68 +108 — 43.9% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -1.73
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1655 110.2 +1.39 -2.44 1.279 52.9% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.07
Career — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 — 1843 144.0 +0.61 -0.96 0.980 49.8% -93 +83 -39 46.7% -0.17 52–74 (41%) 90–107 (46%) 97.3 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.