H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Denis Kudla vs Antonio Veic H2H: 0-1
Antonio Veic holds a 1–0 lead over Denis Kudla in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Antonio Veic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Antonio Veic won the 2012 Miami Masters first round 2-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Antonio Veic | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | Denis Kudla | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Kudla | #1,269 | #53 | 858 | 1,836 | 71 | 131 | 35.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Antonio Veic | #888 | #119 | 468 | 1,719 | 10 | 22 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denis Kudla | Antonio Veic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #496 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #276 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #220 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #69 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #191 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #131 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #63 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #114 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #105 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #163 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #267 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |