H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Denis Kudla vs Ruben Bemelmans H2H: 1-0

Denis Kudla holds a 1–0 lead over Ruben Bemelmans in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denis Kudla leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Denis Kudla won the 2018 Newport round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denis Kudla
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Ruben Bemelmans
BEL Age 38 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Denis Kudla #86 6-3 6-4 Ruben Bemelmans #113 Match data Jul 19, 2018* R32 Newport ATP 250 Grass
Denis Kudla #105 6-4 6-4 6-3 Ruben Bemelmans #134 Match data Jun 25, 2013* Q3 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Denis Kudla #1,269 #53 858 1,834 71 132 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ruben Bemelmans #1,092 #84 628 1,756 23 49 31.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denis Kudla Ruben Bemelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 1–1 50.0% #496 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 2–2 50.0% #276 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 2–6 25.0% #137 1,574 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2013 5–11 31.2% #114 1,628 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2014 3–5 37.5% #121 1,702 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2015 8–14 36.4% #69 1,759 0 0 2010 1–4 20.0% #178 1,597 0 0
23 2016 8–20 28.6% #131 1,637 0 0 2011 1–3 25.0% #160 1,634 0 0
24 2017 1–1 50.0% #174 1,593 0 0 2012 3–6 33.3% #111 1,648 0 0
25 2018 11–14 44.0% #63 1,789 0 0 2013 3–5 37.5% #148 1,637 0 0
26 2019 11–22 33.3% #113 1,714 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #114 1,663 0 0 2015 3–8 27.3% #108 1,695 0 0
28 2021 9–11 45.0% #105 1,702 0 0 2016 2–2 50.0% #167 1,645 0 0
29 2022 6–16 27.3% #106 1,571 0 0 2017 5–5 50.0% #118 1,694 0 0
30 2023 3–5 37.5% #163 1,535 0 0 2018 5–14 26.3% #117 1,686 0 0
31 2024 1–3 25.0% #267 1,553 0 0 2019 0–2 0.0% #260 1,590 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Denis Kudla Ruben Bemelmans
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2010 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2016 5 12 17 29.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2011 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2018 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2013 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
26 2019 5 13 18 27.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2021 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2016 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2023 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 3 11 14 21.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2024 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 39 88 127 30.7% 6 18 24 25.0% 26 26 52 50.0% — 16 32 48 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 14 20 30.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 201/203 of Denis Kudla's and 72/72 of Ruben Bemelmans's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Denis Kudla Ruben Bemelmans
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2010 2/2 5.5 3.5 51.7% 63.9% 52.5% 59.6% 41.8% 58.3% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 4/4 5.0 4.5 49.8% 64.8% 53.5% 58.4% 57.3% 59.1% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 8/8 5.0 4.0 55.0% 65.0% 49.5% 56.0% 47.8% 58.2% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 16/16 3.6 2.9 59.8% 71.6% 51.7% 62.9% 32.2% 63.5% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 8/8 3.4 2.5 61.4% 64.2% 51.5% 72.0% 41.7% 59.5% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 21/22 6.1 3.8 61.1% 68.1% 52.0% 50.3% 46.5% 61.7% 34.0% 2010 5/5 7.0 1.0 67.7% 70.3% 43.5% 71.5% 35.7% 61.8% 32.4%
23 2016 27/28 5.8 3.0 59.0% 70.6% 47.7% 51.7% 45.8% 60.9% 34.5% 2011 4/4 4.5 4.5 58.7% 73.6% 49.1% 67.8% 37.1% 63.3% 34.2%
24 2017 2/2 3.5 3.5 64.3% 70.5% 53.8% 47.5% 48.1% 64.5% 40.9% 2012 9/9 5.7 3.7 60.7% 68.7% 48.3% 56.0% 49.7% 60.7% 35.4%
25 2018 25/25 8.4 4.0 56.4% 75.4% 50.5% 51.5% 40.2% 64.5% 33.8% 2013 8/8 8.0 3.3 65.0% 73.1% 50.6% 69.6% 37.6% 65.5% 36.9%
26 2019 33/33 6.1 3.6 57.0% 67.2% 48.3% 51.3% 39.6% 59.2% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 1/1 19.0 7.0 61.9% 74.0% 51.6% 58.3% 75.0% 65.5% 30.7% 2015 11/11 7.3 4.5 62.0% 72.0% 51.2% 51.1% 35.3% 64.2% 30.8%
28 2021 20/20 6.5 4.0 55.8% 71.7% 51.1% 49.7% 35.6% 62.6% 33.4% 2016 4/4 6.5 2.3 68.6% 65.9% 50.7% 76.7% 55.0% 61.0% 31.2%
29 2022 22/22 4.9 2.5 62.1% 68.0% 49.6% 54.3% 44.2% 61.1% 32.8% 2017 10/10 6.6 2.4 65.3% 68.5% 53.9% 53.6% 31.4% 63.1% 32.1%
30 2023 8/8 4.3 2.6 61.1% 68.2% 52.6% 49.1% 49.2% 62.0% 30.9% 2018 19/19 5.8 3.2 65.4% 66.5% 47.0% 59.4% 38.4% 59.9% 33.4%
31 2024 4/4 4.8 2.5 54.3% 65.9% 42.6% 45.8% 25.7% 55.1% 35.7% 2019 2/2 0.5 1.5 65.5% 57.5% 42.9% 48.7% 25.0% 52.5% 28.0%
Career — 201/203 5.8 3.4 58.4% 69.4% 50.0% 53.4% 41.9% 61.3% 33.9% — 72/72 6.3 3.2 64.2% 69.0% 49.1% 60.0% 38.6% 61.9% 33.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Denis Kudla Ruben Bemelmans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2009 1488 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1501 96.9 -2.83 -2.17 0.943 49.3% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1559 106.8 -2.45 -0.04 0.882 49.1% — — +89 50.0% -0.20 1–1 2–0 — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1575 117.0 -1.45 -0.61 0.812 46.4% +24 — — 33.3% -1.13 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.6 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1629 124.1 -1.05 -1.44 0.913 48.6% -38 — +119 34.9% -0.42 1–2 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 94.4 +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 1703 119.7 -2.21 +1.02 0.937 48.9% -49 — +117 36.4% -0.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.25 2009 1500 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 1759 142.0 -2.26 -1.39 0.887 48.2% -24 — +121 40.3% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.9 +0.36 2010 1597 122.5 +0.88 -0.33 0.848 47.3% +32 — — 38.5% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.22
23 2016 1637 127.5 -2.48 -0.93 0.882 47.5% +20 -22 +109 30.0% -1.09 5–5 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.3 -0.48 2011 1634 112.3 +0.10 -0.35 0.931 49.4% — — +60 46.2% -0.61 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.05
24 2017 1593 110.5 -3.46 +3.63 1.150 51.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 — — +0.35 2012 1648 118.1 -1.91 -0.07 0.901 48.3% -38 — +135 40.0% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 -0.13
25 2018 1790 136.9 +0.60 -0.85 0.952 49.2% -49 -94 0 45.3% -0.31 2–3 (40%) 5–8 (38%) 99.1 -1.08 2013 1638 125.5 +0.65 0.00 1.070 51.5% +20 — — 42.9% +0.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.3 +0.14
26 2019 1715 129.0 -3.76 -1.81 0.825 46.4% -3 -110 +45 36.4% -0.97 5–4 (56%) 6–6 (50%) 101.3 -0.65 2014 1628 113.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 1663 114.4 -0.49 +1.01 0.888 49.1% — — — 40.0% -0.60 0–1 1–0 — -0.17 2015 1695 124.5 -1.03 -1.29 0.860 47.4% +26 — — 27.6% -1.28 0–2 2–4 (33%) — -0.88
28 2021 1703 130.5 -0.68 -1.57 0.893 48.0% -32 — +158 42.9% -0.43 6–3 (67%) 6–6 (50%) 103.2 +0.54 2016 1646 110.6 -0.49 -2.17 0.800 48.0% +6 — — 46.2% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.19
29 2022 1571 126.0 -2.43 -1.28 0.845 47.4% +31 — +202 34.4% -0.87 4–6 (40%) 3–12 (20%) 93.4 +0.23 2017 1694 125.7 -0.20 -0.85 0.870 48.1% -61 — +90 41.9% -0.45 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 105.5 -0.25
30 2023 1536 113.1 -1.49 -0.41 0.815 46.2% +20 — — 36.4% -1.27 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.05 2018 1686 128.9 -2.91 -1.28 0.833 47.2% -22 — +111 35.2% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 4–7 (36%) 93.4 -0.61
31 2024 1554 115.2 -2.14 -1.75 0.794 45.3% +28 — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 1–1 — +0.26 2019 1590 108.5 -1.92 +0.26 0.590 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.40 — — — -0.16
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1599 107.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1552 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1518 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1835 131.9 -1.89 -1.10 0.878 47.8% -7 -74 +95 37.7% -0.71 34–34 (50%) 38–54 (41%) 97.1 +0.44 — 1756 123.9 -1.13 -0.82 0.871 48.0% -8 — +101 37.3% -0.70 9–20 (31%) 15–23 (39%) 89.1 -2.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.